A Platonist "precept"/"vow" of monastic poverty

 Given here is an explicit statement of philosophos conduct/practice that could be added to a list of such surviving explicit "regulations" compiled from the extant written Platonist texts, from the Dialogs to the end of Platonism in antiquity, though so much appears to be lost or never committed to writing, though the Phaedo also enjoins voluntary monastic poverty, I think, pretty explicitly, and it is also at least implied, if not outright stated, in the Politea:

 

"O both dear Pan and how many other gods (are) here, give to me to become/be beautiful/noble inside: but how much I have outside to be friendly with the things inside for me.  And may I consider the wise person rich: and may the quantity of gold for me be how much no one other than the one having control over sensual desires, the sane person, would be able to bear or manage/observe."  (Phaedrus, 279 b9-c3)

 

The above is my own rendering, which may differ noticeably from other translations of the Phaedrus.

 

Here are a few other explicit  statements for a list for a philosophos’ “rule” from some surviving fragments (all in my own quick, rough draft, off the cuff translations):

From Olympiodorus' commentary on the Phaedo:

" "The philosopher, as far as is not absolutely necessary, looks down upon/disdains the care of the body"...The are three (kinds of) activities:  either natural and necessary, as taking nourishment and sleeping; or natural, but not necessary, as sexual intercourse; or neither natural nor necessary, as finery and how many things there are of variegated clothing--there being these three (kinds of) activities, therefore, the philosopher will have nothing at all to do with the natural but not necessary and the neither natural nor necessary, but will thrust them away from himself/reject/despise them (for nocturnal emissions will suffice for him in regard to secretion of semen), but he will make use of the first (i.e., the natural and necessary) a little bit perfunctorily/pro forma, as not to take his fill/make much of them.  "If, then, these things are thus, the philosopher, as far as is not absolutely necessary, disdains the body; such a one is willing to die; the philosopher therefore practices death."..."

This is a clear and explicit statement that the Platonist philosophos is a celibate ascetic. 

From Damascius' commentary on the Phaedo:

"...the contemplative philosopher is one wanting as his goal having been made one with the (hypostases) above himself and to be theirs rather than of himself:  on which account (Plato) says "(it is not lawful) for the not pure to touch the pure".

It is necessary for the one being purified and hastening to be made like the Pure first to reject pleasures and pains as far as he is able; second, he must nourish himself with plain, simple food without luxury, but also food that is righteous and temperate (but this is untainted with blood and spotless) and that is holy and in accord with ancestral practice (for the food that is unholy and harming animals and coarsening the spirit makes the body intractable to the soul and unfit for contact with God); third, he must cut off the unharmonious wrong motion of the appetitive irrationality (for what would one standing aloof from all external things desire and with what would he be angry?), but if ever such a sort of thing would be moved either awake or asleep, it is most quickly put down by the reason; fourth, he must keep away from all sense-perceptions and imaginations, as far as it is not necessary to use them; fifth, the one wanting to be released from the multiplicity of becoming is to be separated from the opinions of all various sorts; the sixth precept out of all of them, is to escape the variegated complexity of thought and pursue the simpler expositions and distinctions with a view to becoming accustomed to the undivided intelligence."

This is an injunction to vegetarianism. 

The Timaeus is explicitly vegan, as is the Epinomis.

Of course, Porphyry tells us in the "Life" that Plotinus "didn't abide to take medicines made from wild animals, saying that neither did he allow foods from the bodies of domesticated animals" and Porphyry, of course, wrote his whole book on the necessity of vegetarianism, and with it philosophical asceticism.

Though it is not directly from Platonism, but from Neo-Pythagoreanism, which is likely more derived from Platonism, in Philostratus' LIfe of Apollonius of Tyana, Apollonius is given as explicitly and in detail setting forth as necessary 'precepts' 'the big three':  celibacy in all respects,  vegetarianism and probably veganism (including not wearing leather, etc.), and teetotalling:

“For if someone has come to my standards of conduct, he would choose to get rid of all food (lit., how much of a table) of (i.e., coming from) animals; and he would utterly forget wine and not make turbid the vessel of wisdom that stands in the souls of those abstaining from wine; neither a cloak will warm him, nor wool, that has been shorn from an animal, and I give to him shoes of papyrus, and to lie down to sleep as it chances; and if I perceive him giving way to sexual desire and love, I have pits of perdition down into which Righteousness, the attendant of Wisdom, bears such people and thrusts them (into them)...”

I think that probably the above examples could be expanded and multiplied many times through searching the fragmentary surviving texts and probably there were many more such explicit prescriptions in the likely much greater bulk of Platonist literature that is lost to us (for example, because of the Muslims burning the great ancient library of Alexandria and the Christians burning whatever may have escaped the Muslims!), but just the above, with, of course, the Phaedo, Republic, and Timaeus and others, may perhaps be enough to obviate concern about any lack of structure or definite prescriptions in Platonism.  It seems that the ascetic Path of Platonism is pretty clear, it's just that it is left to the individual, who is one of the few not the many and is presumed to have some spiritual discernment himself, to work out the exact details in each particular circumstance, without, for instance, the sort of long lists of silly, absurd, and neurotic details given in, for example, the Buddhist Vinayas and the sort of attempts criticized in the Republic to endlessly create detailed rules for every particular circumstance to try to make up for a lack of actual righteousness, renunciation, asceticism, and spiritual discernment and informed-ness and intelligence enabling the ascetic to decide more correctly what to do in each case in accordance with the actual principles of the contemplative ascetic life and practice and the single-minded striving for release and the telos without worldly concerns and desires. 

 

I might make another suggestion of a resolution to feeling a want of a set of formal precepts or regulations for Platonist contemplative ascetics/philosophoi in the extant texts--in fact, a more really Platonist, perhaps, and ultimately more satisfactory and definitive solution.  It is, though, one that is not necessarily easy to implement and hardly anyone now could do it or even try to do it.  If one can manage to clearly and fully "see" or "touch" or "know" or come in contact with in contemplation, having ascended to the noetic realm, to the level of Nous, and entering into it, the actual Form/Idea of "contemplative-ascetic-in itself" or "contemplative-asceticism-in-itself" or "philosophos-in-itself" or "Platonist-renunciant/yogi-in-itself" or etc.--however, one might choose to label it just as a means of focussing on that one particular Form as it truly and really and paradigmatically exists in Nous--one will find that it contains in itself, is the higher source of, (in unity and interpenetration with the separate Forms of the individual virtues, etc.) all the practices/"precepts"/necessary prescriptions/standards of conduct/"regulations”, etc. that we talk about--celibacy, veganism, teetotaling, monastic poverty, abstaining from worldly entertainments, simplicity of food, drink, and clothing, world-renunciation, solitude, sitting in contemplation practice, etc., etc.  All are there, though, of course, not in a series or list of statements in English(!) at the level of discursive thought, but as the actual really existing aspects of the complex level Form.  After thoroughly contemplating this Form at the level of Nous, when the soul is not even really, in a sense, itself but has entered into a degree of unity with Nous, when the soul returns to this level the logoi corresponding to or emanating from the Form will appear clearly in the soul as the statements of necessary practice or conduct at the discursive verbal level.  Hard for me to put the matter into words and a hard thing to do, but I think this is a much more ultimately satisfactory source of and point of reliance for, the real thing, what constitutes ascetic practice and conduct than feeling dependent on karmically appearing sensory experience, which is, after all, really what any text we have is.  As Platonist contemplative ascetics, we have a great advantage and freedom in that our "regulations" of renunciant/ascetic conduct are eternally there and always accessible and real and unerring and not a matter of opinion in the realm of being, in the noetic realm, and we don't have to depend on karmically chancing to encounter teachings of such in the uncertain, always changing, impermanent, only the object of opinion not actual knowledge, sensory realm of becoming like practitioners of other systems.  (And, ultimately, even further, our askesis comes from the source of all knowledge, the Good Itself, and direct contact and union with the Good will also, even more, upon the return, lead to all the logoi of contemplative ascetic practice being present at the discursive level in the soul.)  All the prescriptions and ideas of ascetic practice that we read about in Platonist texts and/or in the texts of other systems can then serve as reminders to help the soul recollect the real ascetic standards that it once knew in itself and now recontacts or remembers or learns in contemplation.  (The Platonist teaching of learning being recollection solves a multitude of difficulties!)

 

These Writings Now Available in Book Form

The essays, pieces, and translations on this blogspot site up to this date are now available in printed book form from lulu.com and all the regular online retail booksellers.  The full information:  Eric Fallick, Platonist Contemplative Asceticism:  Practice and Principle, ISBN 978-0-359-77301-5.
http://www.lulu.com/shop/eric-fallick/platonist-contemplative-asceticism-practice-and-principle/paperback/product-24173074.html

A Couple of Q. and A.'s About Beginning Renunciation

Q. I am a 18-year-old (nearly 19) soon-to-be renunciant and ascetic,
hopefully, as it cannot be ignored that you cannot have the world
and the great rewards of salvation and freedom. I found your blog in
my investigation of Platonism, as it is a pure system where the
majority of (if not all of it completely!) it's teachings are true. Of
course, as I am new to studying it, I have to keep researching, and
read all of Plato. Your blog has been extremely helpful in this
effort, and the starting point of renunciation for any genuine
spiritual practice is self-evidently true. How doing this reflects God
("the One" or "the Absolute" as you call Him) is amazing. Though, to
begin, although some things can be renounced immediately with ease
("don't read fiction books, apply yourself to spiritual text" and
"don't lust after sweets, and don't eat meats", etc), I had a few
questions about the whole process, and your experience with it.

The first is about how to begin the initial efforts and survive the
fatigue when the excitement of a new, more proper, life begins. I
expect there to be failings and relapses (though it should be avoided
at all cost). I see one method to possibly use is continued meditation
on why you began this, escape from the world, and how perfect God is.
How did you overcome this period? How would you recommend someone who
has lived a very sedentary, and "pleasurable" life to do this? After a
while, does it just become more natural? If so, how long is this?

The second is about the temptation to return to the world and it's
ways if it arises. What methods do you have for overcoming this? Or is
it that after a while, and true cognitive change has happened,
temptation doesn't really happen (or is very weak)?

I hope that you can answer these, and again I thank you for your blog
and your efforts to spread this information.



A. Thank you very much for reading and appreciating my writings. Of course, I greatly encourage and exhort you to retain your new-found understanding of the necessity of renunciation and asceticism and to practice this for the remainder of this birth and, indeed, for all future births until you attain liberation. Please stick to it no matter how difficult it may be in this present world where there is so little, to say the least, appreciation, respect and support for renunciation and true spiritual practice. I hope, as you kindly say, my writings may be of modest help in this regard.

I began, or renewed, my spiritual practice in earnest in this birth when I was just your age forty years ago. Not encountering any renunciants or real spiritual practitioners, not even the degree of guidance or encouragement that my writings might provide, I had to learn on my own by 'the school of hard knocks' and gradually come to understand the necessity of renunciation and move in that direction despite all the silly people around me discouraging it. It was by reading the records of the ancients, the primary source texts of, at that time, Buddhism, that I understood that the moderns are for the birds and that it was clearly necessary to follow the real Path of the ancients and of all ascetic practitioners of all time, regardless of whether anyone else was or not. Thus, for example, it wasn't until four years later at the age of 22, while I was living at a so-called Zen Community in NY (which I long since repudiate as being completely fraudulent, corrupt and silly), that I took my vow of celibacy on my own (though I had never actually not been celibate and was still virginal anyway). I had already gradually become a most committed and ardent vegetarian by the time I turned 20. I had never been a drinker or party person and had always been of sort of naturally monastic and solitary temperament. I was, however, in my youth and when I was your age, what you have described in your email as 'one who has lived a very sedentary and "pleasurable" life'. I was, and have always been, not very tough physically and have always had much anxiety and was quite a 'wimp' as it were. I just kept gradually working and gently pushing myself and becoming more and more dedicated and ascetic and devoted as my understanding and devotion increased--though, as I say, in various respects other than physical and emotional toughness, I was already naturally of monastic, ascetic, renunciant temperament. The most important thing is to have great sincerity and devotion and dedication and determination to attain release and be devoted to true spiritual practice and renunciation no matter what, and then just gradually and steadily work towards renouncing more and emulating the ideal. Be patient and steady and don't be dismayed by any lapses of the sort that you refer to that may occur. If you fall down, always just pick yourself right up and keep on going. You seem to show remarkable insight into how things could work, recognizing that after the initial excitement fades the spiritual path is really a lot of hard continuous work. The kind of meditation that you suggest is a good way to keep yourself going on the right track and also to overcome any temptation to return to the world as you ask about in your second question.

In regard to both your questions, yes, it does get easier and more natural as you go on, and you backslide, even in thought, less. The more disciplined you are the easier and more natural discipline becomes. Once the cognitive shift has really been made and the aspiration for the Way has really been awakened in the soul, there is less and less serious temptation to return to the world--in fact, the thought of doing so is horrifying and revolting. How long this will take in a particular individual case such as your own, I can't say. Everyone is different and has their own individual karma to deal with. But I can say that it will definitely become easier and more natural and inevitable over time, the more diligent and devoted you are within your capacities (though again go gradually without overreaching yourself too much if it becomes discouraging). Also, some things are more difficult than others. For example, sexual desire is one of the very most difficult things to eradicate and deal with and you can expect to struggle with it and have it around for very many years to come. Of course, we don't act on it at all and don't really dream of doing so, even when thoughts and fantasies run off at length in that direction, but we still have to deal with it and be very careful about it. Perhaps, more renunciants, especially now, have fallen because of women than anything else. Other things, though, also can be hard to leave--even such as if you are still living at home and your family has a television and you get drawn into watching it!

A couple of concrete suggestions: It is very important, however much long struggle it may take, to establish a regular routine of going to bed early and getting up very early before dawn to spend time in meditation/contemplation practice. Being disciplined in different areas reinforce each other and make it all easier. A regular daily meditation/contemplation practice is essential to, is the essence of, the Path and of great assistance in developing renunciation and asceticism, indeed, is part and parcel with it. Read regularly and widely in the records and writings of the authentic great ascetics and renunciants of the past of the various systems (much is available in English). This will be of great help and importance in gaining understanding, getting encouragement, and sticking to your devotion. I'm afraid that, except perhaps for myself, you are not very likely in this present age of darkness and this modern brave new techno-world to encounter any living examples to help you and provide support, so you need to take the renunciants of the past (and future and present, though just not visible) as your support, 'the communion of saints' as the Catholics say. Vegetarianism, or, ideally, veganism, is of the greatest and most essential importance and not really very difficult at all and can be implemented rapidly and will be of great help in supporting all your other efforts. Similarly, it should go without saying that any alcohol or intoxicants or illicit drugs (not to say that I think you are doing any of that anyway) are to be immediately and permanently stopped. Even decent ordinary worldlings don't drink and spiritual practice can't even be begun without teetotaling, and, besides, you are legally underage for that anyway. If you can keep 'the big three'--celibacy, vegetarianism, and teetotalling--and keep a regular schedule of meditation/contemplation practice and be devoted to meditation/contemplation practice and spiritual and ascetic reading and study to the best of your ability, the rest will gradually fall into place.

I hope this answers your inquiries somewhat. Again, be patient and diligent and work steadily, gradually, and devotedly, and keep clearly in mind that there is no question that renunciation and asceticism and devotion to contemplative practice is the only way to go and any alternative can't even be entertained.

An Ancient Urban Hermit

An Excerpt from Damascius' Life of Isidore/The Philosophic History

translated from ancient Greek by Eric S. Fallick


Isidore made friends with this man who surpassed all people in piety and in a life of wholly loving wisdom, except for Isidore himself. And the man so greatly excelled in true way of life and speech that what is usually said in a proverb was fulfilled in deed by him: he lived hidden and unnoticed, so that I would expect none of the people then living, neither younger nor older, knew he was the sort of man I say. Nor would anyone else have known the kind of person this Sarapio was, nor would I myself know now, if the philosopher (i. e., Isidore) himself hadn't told me about him. For he said he couldn't ever persuade him to meet with another man; especially when he grew old, he no longer often came down from his own house, but he lived alone in a tiny house, having in reality taken up a solitary life, only having dealings with some of his neighbors for absolute necessities. He did, though, say that Sarapio was especially prayerful and in the manner of a common man wandered about to all the holy places when he was lead by the custom of a holiday, but mostly he spent the whole day at home living, not some human life, but one simply to be said to be divine, always recounting both aspirations and virtues in regard to himself or the Divine, but much more meditating in silence. Being devoted to the search for truth and contemplative by nature, he didn't think it worthwhile to waste time with the more technical details of philosophy, but stuck to more powerful and inspired understandings; on which account he possessed and read pretty much only the writings of Orpheus, always putting each arising question to Isidore, who was, so to speak, the utter tops in theological knowledge, and who was the only one he received and was acquainted with as a friend. And indeed it seemed to Isidore that he saw in Sarapio the life of the fabled Golden Age of Cronos. For he continuously did and said nothing else than collecting himself and always, as far as possible, concentrating on the inward and quite indivisible.

He thus very much looked down on money and property, so that he possessed nothing whatever besides two or three books, including also the poems of Orpheus. He thus very much looked down on the pleasures relating to the body, so that even from the first he indeed only provided the body with necessities, and was through his whole life undefiled by sexual pleasures. And he thus had no care for honor from people, so that not even his name was known in the city. Nor would it have been known afterward, if some god had not wished to favor humanity with an example of the life of the Golden Age of Cronos, in order that the story would not seem to be a myth, without history having been called to witness. For the so-called Cheiron stood rather at the boundary of the reigns of Cronos and Zeus, whence his double form. But this Sarapio known by the philosopher, let him have been recorded as of such a kind. He made Isidore his heir, not having any family, nor anyone else worthy to receive his property, by which I mean his two or three books.



Translation ©2003 Eric S. Fallick platonicascetic (at) (Gee) mail (period) com

Traditional Sexual Morality (Ascetic Perspective)

Traditional Sexual Morality

by Eric S. Fallick


“...but which things make not a small difference, and are hard to persuade about,
are especially the work of a god, if somehow it were possible for injunctions themselves
to come to be from that (god), but now there is likely to be need of some daring steadfast
person who, exceptionally honoring frankness of speech, will say the things seeming to be
best for a polis and citizens, among corrupted souls enjoining the fitting and pursuant
thing for the whole constitution, saying things opposite to the greatest desires, and not having
any person helping, alone following understanding alone.”

Plato, Laws, 835c



Sexual desire, in its broadest and most comprehensive sense and in all respects, including romantic love, is one of the principal things that binds us to the wheel of birth and death and repeated reincarnation and misery. It is the love and desire of the soul turned completely the wrong way, turned totally away from the Divine, the soul's true desire and love, and turned completely to becoming and sensate existence. It moves us further and further, only and always, into becoming and delusion and suffering and defilement, and further and further away from the Divine Absolute and re-union therewith and release from transmigration and individuated sensate existence in space-time. Complete celibacy, again, in its fullest and truest sense, and abstinence from any and all sexual activity whatsoever is required without question to tread the Path to freedom, release from becoming and divine union. It is an absolute ultimate soteriological necessity. It is an uncompromising requisite to even truly begin the Path and practice of true contemplation of the higher hypostases and to progress along it. At the end, at the telos, sexual desire in all its manifestations is, and must be, completely destroyed and eliminated. The true philosophos, the true Platonic contemplative ascetic and renunciant, clearly and intimately understands this and practices it to the best of his ability. Of course, he is in no sense free from sexual desire, this occurs only in accomplishment of the Path, and struggles with it constantly, but he always and without question maintains his physical celibacy and never willingly indulges his sexual desire in any way. Not being cloistered, he struggles continually with restraining his eyes and thoughts, and is always failing, but would never dream of compromising or abandoning his celibacy or of thinking or acting like an ordinary deluded worldling, and always picks up the battle again as soon as he realizes a slip of the eye or mind. The true philosophos, the true Platonist contemplative ascetic and renunciant, always views things from a transmigratory perspective and from an understanding of the actual spiritual nature and working of Reality, not from the superficial perspectives of the sense world and of worldlings. He is a stranger and alien in this world, always directed in every moment to transcending it and ascending to the Divine. He views the world and worldlings and their pursuits from apart, as a lonely outsider, looking down on this world and life from a transcendent, divine and metaphysical perspective and understanding. This is very much the case with the realm of sexuality and worldly love that so preoccupies the world and ordinary worldlings, to the horrible corruption and bondage of their souls and their continued re-becoming.

The real Platonic ascetics, the philosophoi, are, however, even in the best of times, let alone now in these darkest times, always very few. Real and full renunciants truly striving for release from the cycle of birth and death, genesis, and for divine re-union and actually knowing how to do so are rare and lonely outsiders in this world. This Path is not for the many (as upsetting as this may be to many in this democratic, egalitarian, relativist, naturalist age which denies the natural and divine spiritual hierarchy and won't accept, in the spiritual realm, that any way of life or practice or understanding is better than another and relentlessly works to level everything and everyone to the lowest common denominator). So what for the rest? The second and next best approximation, and which is a very good step indeed in a given birth and is to be greatly respected and admired and welcomed in fellowship, is a celibate religious vocation, clerical or monastic, eremitical or cenobitical, within one of the institutionalized religious traditions or systems—Buddhism, Hinduism, Catholicism, Orthodoxy, Jainism, Daoism, etc. This, of course, involves taking on the burden and tie to this world and becoming of a muthos, historicity, understanding of spiritual reality through religious symbols and doctrines, limited and approximate spiritual and metaphysical understanding and praxis, and, usually, at least some amount of institutional and administrative structure and forms and involvement, in contrast to the direct, correct and unmediated understanding and practice of the Platonic contemplative ascetic or philosophos—a burden that sometime in a future birth along the Path will have to be shed—but is nonetheless greatly to be encouraged and applauded and stood shoulder to shoulder with.

In better and more traditional times, and even until the middle of the twentieth century, many, though still, of course, a, usually small, minority, did follow, though, of course, with very varying degrees of sincerity and true vocation and practice, this Way of the celibate religious vocation within the various systems. Now, however, in this ever more deluded secular, naturalist, materialist, post-sexual revolution brave new world, hardly anyone, or very few, are willing or want to follow even this second level celibate religious vocation Way—celibate ascetics and renunciants and religious of any type as a whole are an endangered species. So what about the many, most people, the vast majority even in the best times and almost everyone now? Here we take a much greater quantum leap downwards from the distance between the first two levels of celibate religious ascetics above, to the third level approximation for the many. This third level is the farthest we can go from and the most distant acceptable approximation to actual spiritual reality and practice and understanding and the way things are, as shocking as this may be to the present day. This, the law for the many, the nonnegotiable moral and spiritual standard for the masses and majority of people, is traditional sexual morality: that the only legitimate, lawful, acceptable, allowable, divinely sanctioned form of sexual activity is heterosexual intercourse in an indissoluble monogamous traditional marriage between a man and a woman in the context of the family and procreation. Everything else is proscribed—non- and extra-marital sex, homosexuality, sodomy, masturbation, transgenderism, etc., etc.--everything else. “What!” cry the modern naturalists and the masses that follow them, “Impossible, ridiculous, bigoted, discriminatory, authoritarian, the unenlightened relic of a bygone age, regressive puritanism!” Remember that the present day is the darkest and most deluded age in at least the last 25 or 30 centuries (at least since the 'axial age'). This is the nadir, not the zenith, of human history and development. In most all better, wiser times, in traditional societies more in tune with actual spiritual reality, this traditional sexual morality was, in general, the standard. Of course, always, many honored it more in the breach than the observance, but it was still the officially accepted and respected position, originated by those who understood the true spiritual welfare of the populace and what was truly most helpful to them. It is, in fact, quite possible for most people to observe this traditional sexual morality when it is clearly and definitely understood to be the inviolable norm and is strongly supported by the sanctions of society and culture and religion. Good, decent people did generally observe it for many centuries, even up until the mid-20th century. Just because one has desires, however strong, doesn't mean one has to act on them. Indulgence in sensual desire only strengthens it and begets more desire. Restraint and discipline becomes habitual and lessens desire and makes it more manageable. As the divine Plato points out, it is the acceptability and indulgence in unlawful forms of sexual activity that increases the desire for them. Just as moral people are generally not tempted by and are repelled from incest and other forms of sexuality that everyone considers unholy and morally repugnant, so when this traditional sexual morality is the universally honored norm and everything else is considered unholy and repugnant, it is possible and easier for people to reduce and restrain and abstain from their other sexual desires outside of the acceptable, lawful channel. This is greatly to their spiritual and ultimate and genuine benefit in that as far as they restrain their sexuality and sexual desires and limit their sexual activity to the sanctioned form, to that extent are they in accord with actual divine spiritual reality and are moving slowly towards freedom. On the other hand, to the extent that they freely indulge and increase their sexual appetites of various sorts, the more they move deeper into becoming and bondage and create karma binding themselves ever tighter to the wheel of birth and death. This, of course, requires the turning away from the naturalist, materialist and post-sexual revolution dogma that is the dominant weltanschauung of the present day and is enforced by the institutions of society. But this dogma is actually totally implausible and illogical and is easily refuted—it is only its current prevalence and official enforcement and all pervasiveness that makes it seem plausible and accepted unquestioningly by most people. For most people, re-acceptance of this traditional sexual morality will require acceptance of the muthos of their particular religion that this sexual morality is revealed divine law or the revelation through the superknowledge of the founders or sages of their tradition and that violation of it incurs divine penalty, but this is certainly much truer and closer, if symbolically expressed, to the truth and spiritual reality than the modern naturalist myth and misunderstanding that actually has no connection to Reality whatsoever. For a few, understanding of the philosophical, metaphysical and spiritual reality underlying the injunction to traditional sexual morality will be possible. Even when people do violate the standard, as they still often will, they will be ashamed and know that they are acting non-optimally, which will conduce to their spiritual benefit and ultimate progress in passing through the round of reincarnations. Those who still feel that their desires are absolutely homosexual or otherwise not possible to channel into the acceptable avenue can rejoice in that they have an unequivocal call, therefore, to holy celibacy and complete continence and the religious life.

The only thing that determines the well-being of a person is the closeness or distance of the soul from the Good or the One. Sexual desire, sexuality and sexual activity pulls the soul away from the Good and rivets it to this body and this world and binds it to misery and endless reincarnation. Restraint of sexual desire and continence in the context of a spiritual life moves the soul towards the Good and release from the cycle of birth and death. For the many who aren't going to follow the way of a celibate ascetic renunciant life, the only acceptable alternative is the traditional sexual morality of limitation of sexual activity exclusively to traditional heterosexual monogamous marriage. The sexual revolution and the naturalist worldview that spawned it is wholly pernicious and one of the greatest calamities of human history. (One wonders if Wilhelm Reich has much chance of ever obtaining another human rebirth anytime soon.) A return to a real spiritual weltanschauung and hierarchy and traditional sexual morality and respect for the celibate religious vocation is the only hope for the soul of the modern world.



© 2016 Eric S. Fallick