Showing posts with label Meditation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Meditation. Show all posts

Monday, May 31, 2021

A Q. and A. on the Dialectic and Analogical Reasoning

 Q.  To better understand how Plato thought, I want to learn more about how the Greeks in general thought about metaphor and analogy.  Plato's philosophical style I characterize as heavily analogical. The way the dialectic in general unfolds is never linear or logical.  What are your thoughts?  Are there any texts on analogical reasoning that can help me get a better grasp on the dialectic?

 

 


A.  I’m afraid that this is one that I can't help much with.  I don't know of any texts on analogical reasoning, and have never looked for any such, nor any works on the way the Greeks in general used metaphor and analogy since, again, I have never looked for or been interested in such.  I don't know how many of my works you have read or watched on my internet venues, but you will see that I view Platonism and Plato's own teaching as spiritual teaching for the contemplative ascetic practice and ascent, not as 'thinking' or 'thought' in the modern sense or the modern idea of 'philosophy'.  The dialectic is not a matter of discursive thinking or reasoning based on sense data, but rather is the contemplative ascetic practice of placing the soul in direct contact with Nous and the Forms therein in meditation/contemplation.  The purpose of the 'dialectic' in the dialogs and the 'reasoning' in the Enneads is to facilitate this and help prepare the mind and soul for being able, after long great effort both in asceticism and contemplation/meditation, to make the ascent and enter this condition of contact with and assimilation to Nous, the Divine Mind-Thought--to enter the 'dialectical samadhi', as it were, to borrow a Sanskrit word from the Indian and derivative systems.  (In general, by far, I think, the closest analogies or systems most useful for the Platonic practitioner for comparison are the Indian origin systems of certain schools of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism, rather than Aristotelianism or the later modern Western systems of 'philosophy' based solely on thinking about things without yogic practice.)  I have, if it is of any help, translated, quite literally, Plotinus' (short) Ennead 1.3, On Dialectic at my internet venues and in my book.  I don't know if you have a translation of Plotinus/the Enneads, but some of the more accessible Enneads, such as 5.1, 1.6, and 6.9 might be helpful to you in general, along with the Phaedo, as I have mentioned, and the core books of the Republic, which add more explicitly about the Good/One to the teaching of the Phaedo.  Today, I was rereading Ennead 1.6, On Beauty, in Greek, as I have many times, and was particularly struck by the statement, "But wisdom is the mental act in turning away from the things below and bringing the soul towards the things above."  That is, it is principally and authentically attained in contemplation turning the soul away from the senses and their objects and towards the higher hypostases.  And to do this requires renunciant and ascetic practice and this is as necessary as thinking to understand how things are and Plato's teaching.  Just as an example, as incomprehensible as it may be to most moderns and particularly professor types, being a vegetarian/vegan is as essential to being able to understand Plato as any degree of knowledge of later 'philosophical' systems or historical knowledge!


Sunday, January 12, 2020

The Cave and Buddhist Pasts

An understanding or insight came to me to help me better understand two seemingly different things that I was not altogether clear about for some time. The two things are how to understand the fire and the objects being moved along the wall with the people moving them also talking in the cave in the Parable of the Cave in the Republic and how to understand my Buddhist practice and realization in this and previous births (and my practice and realization in other related systems in other previous births) in relation to the Path and Platonist practice. I have always found the Parable of the Cave extremely important and powerful, but never understood the part about the fire and objects in the cave and the prisoner initially having to look at them and see them as more real than the shadows, with great pain and difficulty, before proceeding to actually move out of the cave. I now see that the fire, which plays a somewhat analogous role in the cave to the sun/the Good outside of the cave, represents the individuated soul at the samsaric/genesic/space-time/changing level, the center of experience/consciousness/awareness, the mind and true mind, which at some level at bottom is connected to the One, comes from the One, the Source of all consciousness and experience. (Recall the individual soul centers in Ennead 6.9 that are all connected to the true center of the One.) The objects being moved along the wall and the people moving them represent the various karmic acts and thoughts of different souls that are illuminated by the true mind or conscious center or soul, including the world-soul, to be projected out as our experience of the sense world, including ourselves in it, as the shadows and echoes on the cave wall. All this is entirely within the cave. Even when the newly released prisoner is finally able to look at the fire and the moving objects and people and understand what is actually going on and that this is more what the shadows actually are and is more real, it is still all just inside the cave and he still hasn't yet moved out into the real world outside. I have long explained an important and vital difference between Platonist practice and contemplation and that of the other related systems, by putting it that the other Indo-hellenistic systems in general, e.g., Chan and related forms of at least Mahayana metaphysics based Buddhist meditation, Advaita Vedanta, at least some forms of Jaina meditation, Orphism even, and etc., all teach and are about just withdrawing into the subject, turning the light of the mind back onto itself and such various expressions. Platonist contemplation, on the other hand, involves not only withdrawing into the subject, but bringing both subject and object up together into the noetic realm where subject and object are distinguished but not separated, and finally into the One where they are not distinguished at all. You will note, for example, that in the Phaedo the soul does not only just withdraw into itself alone but does so in and for contemplation of the Forms and that this constitutes its true collection and withdrawal and when it is in this condition it is always in contact with the real beings and contemplating them. In other words, in the other systems the soul or mind or awareness withdraws from objects to focus on or turn back to itself, recognizing only half or the subjective side of Reality, and realization consists in, to use as an example just one of the many forms of expression, in this case from Chan, "seeing the nature", seeing the center of the soul where it connects to the One, but thinking that this is the actual Absolute or fundamental Reality Itself, whereas it is actually only the derived or emanated soul center or a shadow or image of the Good. In Platonism, on the other hand, the soul, through withdrawal from the whole sensate phenomenal level and recollecting the Forms shifts its whole and all of being back up to Nous or the noetic realm, shifting or identifying itself with Nous and its objects with the Forms, the two not actually being separate and being mutually dependent or co-arising, and realization consists in moving, initially, to this whole higher and more real level of Nous/the Forms and then from there to the ultimate highest level of the One, where there is only One and Good, and final release is attained. Thus, the practice of the other systems is only turning to look at the fire and the objects and moving people in the cave and their realization is to be able to finally look straight at the fire and see it and the objects and people clearly. They think that this is the end and release, but it, while certainly a big step compared to the chained prisoners who only know the shadows and echoes and think that they are all there is, is still just entirely within the cave and they haven't even left it at all. The practice of Platonism, though preliminarily seeing and understanding the fire and all within the cave, is to actually go out of the cave and see first the images of the objects there and then the things there themselves and finally to be able to look directly at the sun and this is its realization and understanding, which is true final release from becoming. When I consider my many years of Buddhist practice and even realization prior to becoming a Platonist and practicing Platonist contemplation, I have in the past been puzzled how to quite fit that into my present askesis and understanding, especially in terms of realization experiences in the course of Buddhist practice. I now see, however, that all this and even the realizations attained was just turning to look at the fire and the objects casting the shadows and getting to be able to look at them--an important step in the very long journey through thousands of births and lifetimes to release from becoming, but still only within the cave--and it is now time to get on with actual progress towards getting out of the cave altogether, seeing the real things out there and the sun, etc. (already actually intermittently begun at some occasions in some previous births) and real ultimate realization and release. I think that this also goes a long way in explaining some of the differences in the other different systems and why even what are supposed to be the realized adepts and texts of the other systems often seem to still be caught up in and involved with particular relative reality systems and versions thereof. Even if they have seen the fire and the passing objects, they are still in the cave and still enmired in the particular configuration of passing objects in their cave not having seen the true archetypes of the Forms, still having known only that set of particulars not the universals. They are still in their particular hollow in the lower earth not having popped up at all yet to see the true earth, in the expression of the Phaedo muthos.

Friday, September 13, 2019

The Reason for Asceticism


Q. I've read a few chapters of your book, and it has prompted me to think more about asceticism, attempting to answer the question: Why is asceticism important and even necessary for the moral and spiritual development of the person? In short, what is the reason for asceticism? 
At this stage, my understanding is that asceticism functions to counteract the cause of our corporeal existence. When the nous fell or broke from unity, there must have been some initial movement, creating the momentum to cause the nous to fall or precipitate from the Good to the lesser, temporal goods (and evils) of mortal and bodily existence. This initial movement was an act of carelessness or negligence with regard to the nous and its unity with the Good. The nous carelessly and negligently turned away from unity to multiplicity in order to pursue individuation, which divided the nous into nous, soul, and body. 
Asceticism is carefulness and thoughtfulness (the antithesis of negligence) functioning as a therapy or antidote or the application of justice to the careless and negligent movement of the nous away from the One, underpinning a process of purification via the instrument of the body that removes the passions from the soul, and allowing in turn for the recovery and return of the nous to unity. 
I was wondering if you could comment on this, confirm my understanding, or correct it in any way? 
A. Thank you for reading some of my book. I don't know if you have read or will get to some of the other essays that explain more of the reason for asceticism, though most of them do in one way or another, and also point out that asceticism is not just instrumental, but the very manifestation or reflection of the Good in this world. In the divine Plato, the Phaedo, especially, among the dialogs, gives extensively the rationale for asceticism, though parts of others do also, and much of the Enneads also explains this (in relation particularly to what you say, see, eg., the beginning of Ennead 5.1). 
I wouldn't say that what you say is incorrect, though I wouldn't say that it is the whole story. One thing I would 'correct', since you ask, is where you say "...purification via the instrument of the body...". I would say, rather, that asceticism is purification from the body, not using the body as an instrument, but rather having as little to do with it (and the sense world) as possible. As you indicate, the fall of the soul is from unity, the Good/One and Nous into cyclic individuated sensate existence in space-time, into the cycle of repeated reincarnation and sensory/bodily existence, and this we have to get free from and return to just being Nous and the One only. To do this, we have to turn the soul, and the whole soul, back around 180 degrees from looking and being in the direction of this lowest darkest least real level of multiplicity and individuated temporal-spatial quasi-existence to looking only at and being only in (and this is the only true being) Nous and the Good. Being involved with the body and the things of this world and pursuing the things of the senses and sensual pleasures and the things of this world of every kind and in every sense is exactly being in the fallen state and pursuing it further and running ever deeper into it and birth and death and looking towards and having the soul turned towards the darkness. Asceticism, having as little to do with the body and the sense world as possible, just doing the minimum necessary to keep the psycho-physical organism going until we can be rid of it, being unconcerned with sensual pleasures, dealing with and seeking only those things of this world minimally necessary for survival, and voluntarily being concerned only with the 
things of the soul and the divine, turning the whole soul as much as possible from the body and sense things to look at and strive for the higher hypostases, is this very process of turning from this fall into and state of becoming back to Nous and the One. This also points towards why I say that asceticism isn't just instrumental, isn't just a means that has to be justified. The highly accomplished contemplative, but who still is bearing his last body and not completely done yet until he is completely free from body, sensory experience, individuation, and being at all in this 'material' world and becoming, would be permanently turned back to Nous and the One except for such minimal attention as still being embodied for a while yet more requires for maintaining the remaining psychophysical existence, and couldn't give more attention to and be concerned with this world and especially sensual pleasures, possessions, etc., etc. than that even if he tried. Not being an ascetic would be not being a contemplative, would be being back in bondage, would be being back an ordinary worldling again. Contemplation and asceticism necessarily go together, are two aspects of the same process, two sides of one coin. Sensual and worldly indulgence and involvement is the exact opposite of contemplation and spiritual practice and moves the soul in the exact opposite direction. One, the soul, can only move in one direction at a time, so there is simply the choice of either pursuing sensual pleasures and worldly things and anti-contemplation and going deeper into bondage and binding oneself tighter to the wheel of birth and death, or renouncing this world and the things of this world and the senses and pursuing asceticism and contemplation hand in hand and going towards freedom from becoming and re-union with Nous and the One. 
I hope that this answers your request for comment a little. It could be a lot to go into in thorough detail and in all aspects. Incidentally, your question sort of reminded me a little of how completely different my way of looking at things, and that of true contemplative ascetics generally, if there are any now, is from that of the world and worldlings, especially now in this modern brave new world. Contemplative asceticism, renunciation, is the obvious necessity and fact and true way and only life that is really life--this seems so obvious and the reasons so clear that the rationale hardly needs to be rehearsed--the burden of proof would be on those who might claim that asceticism and renunciation isn't the way and for any worldlings who would attempt to justify their way, though it would, of course, be impossible for them to do so and they and their thoughts are not in any way in accord with Reality! 

Friday, July 26, 2019

These Writings Now Available in Book Form

The essays, pieces, and translations on this blogspot site up to this date are now available in printed book form from lulu.com and all the regular online retail booksellers.  The full information:  Eric Fallick, Platonist Contemplative Asceticism:  Practice and Principle, ISBN 978-0-359-77301-5.
http://www.lulu.com/shop/eric-fallick/platonist-contemplative-asceticism-practice-and-principle/paperback/product-24173074.html

Sunday, September 9, 2018

A Couple of Q. and A.'s About Beginning Renunciation

Q. I am a 18-year-old (nearly 19) soon-to-be renunciant and ascetic,
hopefully, as it cannot be ignored that you cannot have the world
and the great rewards of salvation and freedom. I found your blog in
my investigation of Platonism, as it is a pure system where the
majority of (if not all of it completely!) it's teachings are true. Of
course, as I am new to studying it, I have to keep researching, and
read all of Plato. Your blog has been extremely helpful in this
effort, and the starting point of renunciation for any genuine
spiritual practice is self-evidently true. How doing this reflects God
("the One" or "the Absolute" as you call Him) is amazing. Though, to
begin, although some things can be renounced immediately with ease
("don't read fiction books, apply yourself to spiritual text" and
"don't lust after sweets, and don't eat meats", etc), I had a few
questions about the whole process, and your experience with it.

The first is about how to begin the initial efforts and survive the
fatigue when the excitement of a new, more proper, life begins. I
expect there to be failings and relapses (though it should be avoided
at all cost). I see one method to possibly use is continued meditation
on why you began this, escape from the world, and how perfect God is.
How did you overcome this period? How would you recommend someone who
has lived a very sedentary, and "pleasurable" life to do this? After a
while, does it just become more natural? If so, how long is this?

The second is about the temptation to return to the world and it's
ways if it arises. What methods do you have for overcoming this? Or is
it that after a while, and true cognitive change has happened,
temptation doesn't really happen (or is very weak)?

I hope that you can answer these, and again I thank you for your blog
and your efforts to spread this information.



A. Thank you very much for reading and appreciating my writings. Of course, I greatly encourage and exhort you to retain your new-found understanding of the necessity of renunciation and asceticism and to practice this for the remainder of this birth and, indeed, for all future births until you attain liberation. Please stick to it no matter how difficult it may be in this present world where there is so little, to say the least, appreciation, respect and support for renunciation and true spiritual practice. I hope, as you kindly say, my writings may be of modest help in this regard.

I began, or renewed, my spiritual practice in earnest in this birth when I was just your age forty years ago. Not encountering any renunciants or real spiritual practitioners, not even the degree of guidance or encouragement that my writings might provide, I had to learn on my own by 'the school of hard knocks' and gradually come to understand the necessity of renunciation and move in that direction despite all the silly people around me discouraging it. It was by reading the records of the ancients, the primary source texts of, at that time, Buddhism, that I understood that the moderns are for the birds and that it was clearly necessary to follow the real Path of the ancients and of all ascetic practitioners of all time, regardless of whether anyone else was or not. Thus, for example, it wasn't until four years later at the age of 22, while I was living at a so-called Zen Community in NY (which I long since repudiate as being completely fraudulent, corrupt and silly), that I took my vow of celibacy on my own (though I had never actually not been celibate and was still virginal anyway). I had already gradually become a most committed and ardent vegetarian by the time I turned 20. I had never been a drinker or party person and had always been of sort of naturally monastic and solitary temperament. I was, however, in my youth and when I was your age, what you have described in your email as 'one who has lived a very sedentary and "pleasurable" life'. I was, and have always been, not very tough physically and have always had much anxiety and was quite a 'wimp' as it were. I just kept gradually working and gently pushing myself and becoming more and more dedicated and ascetic and devoted as my understanding and devotion increased--though, as I say, in various respects other than physical and emotional toughness, I was already naturally of monastic, ascetic, renunciant temperament. The most important thing is to have great sincerity and devotion and dedication and determination to attain release and be devoted to true spiritual practice and renunciation no matter what, and then just gradually and steadily work towards renouncing more and emulating the ideal. Be patient and steady and don't be dismayed by any lapses of the sort that you refer to that may occur. If you fall down, always just pick yourself right up and keep on going. You seem to show remarkable insight into how things could work, recognizing that after the initial excitement fades the spiritual path is really a lot of hard continuous work. The kind of meditation that you suggest is a good way to keep yourself going on the right track and also to overcome any temptation to return to the world as you ask about in your second question.

In regard to both your questions, yes, it does get easier and more natural as you go on, and you backslide, even in thought, less. The more disciplined you are the easier and more natural discipline becomes. Once the cognitive shift has really been made and the aspiration for the Way has really been awakened in the soul, there is less and less serious temptation to return to the world--in fact, the thought of doing so is horrifying and revolting. How long this will take in a particular individual case such as your own, I can't say. Everyone is different and has their own individual karma to deal with. But I can say that it will definitely become easier and more natural and inevitable over time, the more diligent and devoted you are within your capacities (though again go gradually without overreaching yourself too much if it becomes discouraging). Also, some things are more difficult than others. For example, sexual desire is one of the very most difficult things to eradicate and deal with and you can expect to struggle with it and have it around for very many years to come. Of course, we don't act on it at all and don't really dream of doing so, even when thoughts and fantasies run off at length in that direction, but we still have to deal with it and be very careful about it. Perhaps, more renunciants, especially now, have fallen because of women than anything else. Other things, though, also can be hard to leave--even such as if you are still living at home and your family has a television and you get drawn into watching it!

A couple of concrete suggestions: It is very important, however much long struggle it may take, to establish a regular routine of going to bed early and getting up very early before dawn to spend time in meditation/contemplation practice. Being disciplined in different areas reinforce each other and make it all easier. A regular daily meditation/contemplation practice is essential to, is the essence of, the Path and of great assistance in developing renunciation and asceticism, indeed, is part and parcel with it. Read regularly and widely in the records and writings of the authentic great ascetics and renunciants of the past of the various systems (much is available in English). This will be of great help and importance in gaining understanding, getting encouragement, and sticking to your devotion. I'm afraid that, except perhaps for myself, you are not very likely in this present age of darkness and this modern brave new techno-world to encounter any living examples to help you and provide support, so you need to take the renunciants of the past (and future and present, though just not visible) as your support, 'the communion of saints' as the Catholics say. Vegetarianism, or, ideally, veganism, is of the greatest and most essential importance and not really very difficult at all and can be implemented rapidly and will be of great help in supporting all your other efforts. Similarly, it should go without saying that any alcohol or intoxicants or illicit drugs (not to say that I think you are doing any of that anyway) are to be immediately and permanently stopped. Even decent ordinary worldlings don't drink and spiritual practice can't even be begun without teetotaling, and, besides, you are legally underage for that anyway. If you can keep 'the big three'--celibacy, vegetarianism, and teetotalling--and keep a regular schedule of meditation/contemplation practice and be devoted to meditation/contemplation practice and spiritual and ascetic reading and study to the best of your ability, the rest will gradually fall into place.

I hope this answers your inquiries somewhat. Again, be patient and diligent and work steadily, gradually, and devotedly, and keep clearly in mind that there is no question that renunciation and asceticism and devotion to contemplative practice is the only way to go and any alternative can't even be entertained.




Monday, April 2, 2018

An Ancient Urban Hermit

An Excerpt from Damascius' Life of Isidore/The Philosophic History

translated from ancient Greek by Eric S. Fallick


Isidore made friends with this man who surpassed all people in piety and in a life of wholly loving wisdom, except for Isidore himself. And the man so greatly excelled in true way of life and speech that what is usually said in a proverb was fulfilled in deed by him: he lived hidden and unnoticed, so that I would expect none of the people then living, neither younger nor older, knew he was the sort of man I say. Nor would anyone else have known the kind of person this Sarapio was, nor would I myself know now, if the philosopher (i. e., Isidore) himself hadn't told me about him. For he said he couldn't ever persuade him to meet with another man; especially when he grew old, he no longer often came down from his own house, but he lived alone in a tiny house, having in reality taken up a solitary life, only having dealings with some of his neighbors for absolute necessities. He did, though, say that Sarapio was especially prayerful and in the manner of a common man wandered about to all the holy places when he was lead by the custom of a holiday, but mostly he spent the whole day at home living, not some human life, but one simply to be said to be divine, always recounting both aspirations and virtues in regard to himself or the Divine, but much more meditating in silence. Being devoted to the search for truth and contemplative by nature, he didn't think it worthwhile to waste time with the more technical details of philosophy, but stuck to more powerful and inspired understandings; on which account he possessed and read pretty much only the writings of Orpheus, always putting each arising question to Isidore, who was, so to speak, the utter tops in theological knowledge, and who was the only one he received and was acquainted with as a friend. And indeed it seemed to Isidore that he saw in Sarapio the life of the fabled Golden Age of Cronos. For he continuously did and said nothing else than collecting himself and always, as far as possible, concentrating on the inward and quite indivisible.

He thus very much looked down on money and property, so that he possessed nothing whatever besides two or three books, including also the poems of Orpheus. He thus very much looked down on the pleasures relating to the body, so that even from the first he indeed only provided the body with necessities, and was through his whole life undefiled by sexual pleasures. And he thus had no care for honor from people, so that not even his name was known in the city. Nor would it have been known afterward, if some god had not wished to favor humanity with an example of the life of the Golden Age of Cronos, in order that the story would not seem to be a myth, without history having been called to witness. For the so-called Cheiron stood rather at the boundary of the reigns of Cronos and Zeus, whence his double form. But this Sarapio known by the philosopher, let him have been recorded as of such a kind. He made Isidore his heir, not having any family, nor anyone else worthy to receive his property, by which I mean his two or three books.



Translation ©2003 Eric S. Fallick platonicascetic (at) (Gee) mail (period) com

Friday, March 9, 2018

Q. and A.'s, including beginning meditation instructions

Q. and A. on A Mother's Death and Destinations of Rebirth


Q. I have another question to ask if I may.... my mother passed away, and this is why I like "rebirth" with the idea in mind that I'll see her again (hopefully if she is a angel in heaven!) What does Platonic metaphysics say of worlds like heavens? I remember asking another ("alleged") Platonist regarding I think the 32 realms found in Buddhism and he said something along the lines of "there are no planes, there is only wisdom and agnosis". I remember asking him about Plato when he talked of realms, asking if they were literal, he said he (talking of Plato) was literal. So now I'm puzzled.
A. I will try to answer your question according to my understanding, which I make no claim to be that of anyone else. Rebirth and reincarnation is, of course, quite literally true. There is, however, as I have tried to indicate in my previous replies, no independent physical world, only experience, only Mind, and, thus, no fixed 'geography' or 'topography' of places of rebirth. At this lowest level of individuated sensate existence in space-time, all manner of rebirths, within the limits of the laws of this level, are possible according to the karma of each individual soul. Some of these may bear some resemblance to the typologies given in various traditions and texts, but many are possible--all just relative individuated experiences at the level of soul, all just to be transcended. Your mother has no doubt been reborn with the experiential set of circumstances dictated by her karma and the Law of the All, but I can't say what that is. Whether you ever encounter her again sometime during the long weary round of rebirth throughout the long dark night of time depends on your mutual karmas, and again we can't say now. Even if you did somehow meet again, it probably isn't likely that you (or she) would know it or recognize each other in relation to the particular relationship of mother-son in this birth. In any case, it is not a goal to be wished for. I'm sorry that you are grieved at the loss of your mother, but, if I may gently and respectfully point out, the idea of spiritual practice and metaphysical understanding is not to assuage worldly grief or cater to worldly desires and attachments, but to gain a broader perspective on these things and free oneself from emotional attachment to the things of this world and, ultimately, from this world and the level of soul and individuated sensate existence in space-time altogether. You have had and have lost countless mothers in the past through countless rebirths--now is the time to start striving to get free of the whole mess altogether!
***************************

Q. and A. on Beginning Meditation Practice

Q. I would like to start a meditation practice as you recommended. What are the steps?
A. It's great that you would like to start a meditation/contemplation practice. Again, please read carefully my essay THE PRACTICE OF CONTEMPLATION, also, there are a couple of preliminary meditations mentioned in MEDITATION FOR WORLDLINGS (though, of course, you are not a worldling!). Half an hour twice every day might be good to start--at regular times/on a regular schedule is best. The best time for meditation/contemplation practice, as universally agreed upon by all the contemplative ascetic systems, is upon arising very early in the morning. It is good to get into an 'early to bed, early to rise' regular routine, going to bed and getting up early to meditate at the same time every day. (From the time stamp of your emails, it looks like this might be a big change and reversal for you and could take a lot of getting used to, but I think you would eventually find it good and rewarding and good for discipline.) When you go to meditate, sit up straight on a firm/hard chair or, if you prefer, cross-legged on the floor. (I sit on the floor in the 'quarter-lotus' position, as I have for so many years. I get up, and have for more than thirty years, at 4:30 AM and meditate for two hours from about 5 to 7 AM. I also meditate for at least another hour later in the day--at a time depending on my work schedule. I go to sleep around 9:30 PM, but also take a nap at some point during the day, again depending on my work schedule.) Close your eyes and rest your hands either on your lap or on your knees. If you like, you could repeat one of your aphorisms mentally several times to settle down. Then, pick one Platonic Form/Idea and focus and concentrate and think on it continuously to the exclusion of all else--even though at first and probably for a very long time you won't be able to actually touch the Form itself. If one particular Form--such as beauty, sophrosune, dikaiosune, the ideal sage, or whatever--especially appeals to you, you may use that. Or, to start, you could just take the Form/Idea of 'triangle-in-itself'. Just try to continually think on/of and contact the Idea of triangle per se--not a visual or other sensory image, not any particular kind of triangle, but just the very intelligible notion of a triangle before any specific sensory experience of a triangle or any specific type of triangle, as all sensible triangles must be, but triangle-in-itself is not. Your mind and thoughts will almost immediately and constantly go off onto something else and into thinking about all sorts of things (not even necessarily wholesome!), but just keep continually gently bringing it back to the Idea/Form over and over again--you will do this countless times even just in half an hour! It is very difficult and takes a long time, so don't be discouraged, just keep going on and steadily working--it is most essential and rewarding, so just stick with it patiently whatever the difficulties or seeming lack of results.
**********************

Q. and A. on Recollection

Q. Therefore intelligence does not depend upon sense perception, being independent from it, but sense perception does depend upon intelligence. This would be a rejection of scientism, which constantly says to man "Your mind is just a neurological process." I do not pretend to fully understand how knowledge can be remembrance. I would like your help understanding it

A. You are right that "intelligence does not depend on sense perception...but sense perception does depend on intelligence", and, with long and dedicated practice, you will experience and know this directly for yourself in the contemplation practice described above. This is indeed a complete rejection of scientism, which, unfortunately, is all around us in this darkest of times, even though it is the most deluded of views (to me, at least, it is quite scary being in such an environment, surrounded by mad beings going the exact opposite way from that in which we are going!). We could correspond about/discuss this more sometime, but, very briefly, the idea of empirical knowledge being recollection (or, actually, true non-empirical knowledge) is related to all this. In creating or experiencing sense perception and relative experience in space-time, the soul creates and organizes its experience based on its true knowledge of the Forms/Ideas that it had, even if unaware of it, from its being from and still in its higher part in contact with Nous. Otherwise, there couldn't be coherent relative experience at all--a mass of sensations per se is meaningless. To take the example given above, the soul has the innate knowledge eternally of triangle-in-itself. No sensory triangle as perceived by sense perception in this world is really a true and perfect and complete triangle and the true idea of triangle can't be derived from any sensory triangle. Perceiving, however, the imperfect phantom copies of one or more triangles in the sensory world, the soul refers these perceptions and sensory data to the Idea of triangle-in-itself that it innately possesses and is reminded of this Idea that it was previously no longer aware of, had 'forgotten', and uses this Idea to construct and organize the experience of a relative sensory triangle, which would otherwise be impossible--disorganized sense impressions being meaningless and impossible in themselves. Thus, 'knowledge' at a relative empirical level of empirical sensory triangles and what they are is really recollection of the absolute Idea of triangle-in-itself that the soul has always had but not recalled to the lower conscious level. (And, in fact, even the sensory experience is from the beginning a projection of soul (ours and the world-soul) of the Idea from the level of Nous, so the whole process is really remembering from beginning to end.)



Wednesday, March 7, 2018

Letter to a Modern Secular Materialist Positivist Skeptic

Letter to a Modern Secular Materialist Positivist Skeptic

by Eric S. Fallick


You are unwilling to adopt a definite spiritual understanding and contemplative ascetic life and practice because you think that you don't have direct empirical evidence or personal experience to know their truth. You don't realize that you are already full of undemonstrated beliefs, that it is impossible to operate without a belief structure, that you have to stand somewhere. Through lack of philosophical understanding, you have simply adopted without question or conscious awareness the most dubious and undemonstrable belief structure of the modern world and scientism that holds that only the things of the senses and individual subjective experience are actual and positively demonstrable, while actually it can be shown that these are the least reliable. This is most unfortunate, but perhaps not surprising since this is the attitude and environment all around you and is most insidious in presenting itself as self-evident rather than another most questionable belief structure and actually denies the validity of metaphysics while not realizing that it is, in fact, just based on another and unquestioned, but illogical, metaphysics—that of materialism, positivism, naturalism, sensationalism, etc. Ultimately, however, this is due to your own heavy karma and deep rooted delusion, which has resulted in both the circumstances of your present birth and, more particularly, your accepting the belief structure of the modern world around you and your inability to shift to a truer structure and your ongoing doubts and skepticism. Since, however, this is how you feel, let's see what your own personal, positivistically evident experience actually tells you.

Here is something you know directly for yourself from your own experience: You will die. Whether in five minutes or sixty years, you will die. You obviously know this to be the case since you don't know or have ever heard of anyone who hasn't or doesn't die. You also know directly from your own experience that nothing in the spatio-temporal sense world, no sense-perceptible thing, is permanent and lasts—everything perishes after a (relatively short!) time and disappears. You know this since you have never seen and can't think of any sense-perceptible or phenomenal thing that lasts forever. Thus, since you know that you will die and that everything in this world will pass away, you know that there is nothing you can pursue in this world that you can keep and have for more than a very short time and that you will have to leave everything behind at death. People, family, friends, wives, children, possessions, pleasures, worldly knowledge, etc., etc.—you can't keep anything. This you know yourself to be the case. Therefore, the only logical and reasonable thing to do under such a circumstance is to renounce and give up all these things that you can't keep and seek for something that is permanent and can give lasting satisfaction. What is there that you know from your own direct experience that is constant? Where can you look from your own experience for something permanent? In fact, it is the fact of experience itself, the soul or spirit or subject that experiences impermanence and all the passing phenomena, including the phenomena of body and mind. This must stand outside the space-time frame or it would not be possible to know of or experience the passing variety and series of spatio-temporal phenomena. Experience itself per se, the soul/spirit/subject must continue the same for any particular changing experiences to be possible at all. Thus, though you don't realize it, you really know directly for yourself from your own experience the fact of rebirth/reincarnation since otherwise it wouldn't be possible for you to know the experience of death. Since the soul/spirit/experience itself is the only thing that you have and have direct personal experience of that could possibly last beyond your death (which is coming very soon—a whole long lifetime of 100 years is only an instant compared to the whole of time), the only at all sane occupation of your life would be the purification and extrication of your soul from the impermanent, imperishable space-time world and objects. Thus, it seems to me, you actually already have the essential framework of the Indo-hellenistic spiritual systems and practice as a matter of your direct personal experience and the decision to become a renunciant/contemplative ascetic devoted to meditation, study, striving for liberation, etc. is already made for you as a matter of your direct personal experience.

Now, at this point, with your doubting mind, you might say, “OK, now I know from my own experience the facts of the immortality of the soul, the cycle of reincarnation and the logical desirability of release from this, but how do I know that there is actually something else besides this endless cycle of rebirth and that I can attain to it and attain release and thereby should exert the effort to do so?” From your own personal experience, you know that experience consists not only of your own self or soul, of the subject only, but also that there are objects of experience and that other souls are included in your own experience—that you experience the existence of other souls and of objects of experience, that you know yourself as bounded, with other selves and things beyond this boundary. This would not be possible if there were not another greater overarching mind that experiences the whole and with which you are connected and in which you are rooted, that goes beyond the boundaries and lets you experience beyond your own boundaries and, to a limited extent, the whole. Further, you know from your own experience that your knowledge is limited and imperfect and that you can err. You would not be able to recognize limited and imperfect knowledge and error unless there were a standard and fact of complete perfect knowledge and truth to compare it to greater than your own limited knowledge and unless you were in some way in contact with and rooted in it. Knowledge must exist in and for a mind. Thus, there must be a greater, all complete, all encompassing, true, unerring mind that you have contact with and that provides the standards by which you know that your own knowledge may be incomplete, imperfect or erroneous. Thus, you also know from your own personal experience that there is an Absolute, an Absolute Mind, greater than yourself outside of the limited time-space world of rebirth and finite experience and that you are already somehow and to some extent in contact with it. How do you know that you can attain union with this Absolute Mind and come yourself to be outside the finite world and cycle of rebirth? You know from your own personal experience that your own knowledge can become better and more complete and truer and you don't know and have never experienced a limit to this process. Since your own knowledge is by nature limited, your increase in truer and more complete knowledge and knowing that it is so can only come from gaining such knowledge from the complete true knowledge of the Absolute Mind, from greater contact with the Absolute Mind. The more complete and true your knowledge becomes, the more you have contact with the Absolute Mind, the more your knowledge resembles and is that of the Absolute Mind. When your knowledge would become coterminous with the complete knowledge of the Absolute Mind, there would be nothing left to distinguish you from the Absolute Mind, you would be the Absolute Mind. Thus, you know that it is possible to attain union with the Absolute Mind and come to be outside of birth and death.

Now, finally, you may doubt, “OK, I see that I have to logically grant all this, but how do I know for sure that contemplative asceticism is the way to this re-union and release? How do I know that meditation or contemplation is the method to accomplish this? Even if it is, how do I know that renunciation is necessary in order to do it?” You have already granted that the way to re-union and release is to merge your mind with the Absolute Mind, to make your mind coextensive with the Absolute Mind. How else is this to be accomplished but in formal contemplation or meditation, along with ancillary study? Contemplation is the very practice of consciously and continuously exerting your soul to come into contact with, be filled by, receive knowledge from and merge with the Absolute Mind. This obviously requires the formal sitting practice of contemplation in which you attempt to free your mind from other content and concerns to fill it from the Divine Mind. How else could your soul receive the impress of the Divine Mind if it is not trying, at least for the period of contemplation, to be free from the content and impresses of the limited sense world? Your mind or soul cannot be directed in two opposite ways and be filled with two mutually conflicting contents at the same time! Thus, it is clear that formal contemplation practice is the necessary way—though, of course, it needs to be informed by a proper understanding gained through study and reflection so that you know what you are doing. It is also obvious, upon even a little reflection, and logical that this requires full world renunciation and asceticism to such an extent as is possible. First of all, even a little beginning effort will show you empirically that this is a most, in fact, supremely difficult and lengthy task. It clearly requires all the time and energy you can give to it. How could you possibly devote such necessary effort to the spiritual path while still occupied with pursuing and indulging in worldly desires and pursuits—sex, relationships, family, career ambitions, entertainments, fancy food and drink for pleasure, hobbies, literature, activism, news, etc., etc.—all of which require much time and energy and thought and take all this away from contemplative practice and study, which, it should be obvious, requires all the time, energy and effort you can muster if it is to be at all successful. How in the world, again, also, can you fill your mind and soul with all these things outside of contemplation and then expect to suddenly empty yourself of them in contemplation to receive the impress of the Absolute Mind? It would be like trying to put out a fire while at the same time stoking it with fuel and gasoline, or trying to erase a chalkboard at one end while continuing to write on it at an even greater rate at the other end, or trying to record a disk with two completely different and discordant sound sources at the same time! All worldly pursuits and desires and indulgences, as you can easily verify in a short time from your own experience if you try to practice contemplation without renunciation and ceasing from these worldly things, turn the soul completely towards becoming, which is the state of the finite soul, as is clear from the discussion above, instead of to being, which is the state of the Divine Mind that you are trying to attain to. Can it be any more obvious and logical, even just from your own experience and reflection, that you can't turn in two opposite directions at the same time? Thus, it is clear without doubt that contemplation, meditation, renunciation and asceticism are the Path and the only way to accomplish the goal that has appeared as incontrovertibly logically necessary even just on the basis of the personal experience that each person indubitably has, if they would only reflect on it.

So, there you have it. Even just on the basis of everyone's common human experience, the understanding is clear and the only possible reasonable way to proceed is manifest. Slough off your deluded modern physicalist conditioning, my friend, and rouse yourself from your positivist slumbers. Awaken the innate understanding and aspiration of your soul and get going full speed ahead on the Path to freedom from rebirth and sensate existence and misery. You have nothing to lose but your bondage and suffering and ignorance!


©2016 Eric S. Fallick platonicascetic (with) (Gee) mail (period) com



Sunday, March 4, 2018

Of Gurus and Godmen

Of Gurus and Godmen

by Eric S. Fallick


“Although no real teacher exists, for one who knows is at once emancipated,
yet no contradiction finds place here, because knowledge can arise through
an imagined teacher.”
The Vedanta Siddhantamuktavali of Prakasananda, tr. by
Arthur Venis, p. 142


Many spiritual and contemplative systems include the institution and idea of the guru, lama, Chan/Zen master, sheik, tzaddik and the like. This idea comprehends the notion of a spiritual teacher who is supposed to be fully accomplished, realized, “enlightened”, knowing everything about how things are and guiding students and to whom students or disciples are supposed to submit, follow, obey, serve, idolize, imitate and even worship. They are supposed to regard the guru (this term will henceforth be used as an umbrella term for all the different names and variations on the theme) as a god, God incarnate, a Buddha, having special direct access to God, etc. In these systems, it is considered that the student can't proceed or accomplish the goal of the system without the guru and is dependent on the guru for spiritual progress, and the guru often performs rituals of initiation, ordination, etc., and is even supposed to supply necessary blessings, protection and so forth, along with detailed instructions (often secret and revealed only to the sufficiently submissive and obedient initiate). This institution continues as present in many, if not most, of the meditation/mystical oriented spiritual systems extant in the modern world, including the modern West, however attenuated, diluted, degenerated, confused, ersatz and vestigial the extant traditions may be. Even in those systems that don't actually include the guru idea and institution, the masses of starry-eyed silly people regularly exalt spiritual teachers and clergy to this status, with or without the encouragement of the objects of their glorification, and altogether regardless of their actual spiritual development, of the whole notion of which the people are generally without a clue. Of course, the founders and early figures of the various systems are usually deified. This whole idea and institution is, I think, highly problematic, to say the least, and erroneous, both pragmatically and on fundamental spiritual and metaphysical principles and facts. Here, I would like to briefly consider some of these problems and errors.

First of all, the whole guru business is, to use Abrahamic terminology, a form of idolatry. The whole purpose and goal of contemplative spiritual practice is to attain realization of and re-union with the Absolute, the One, the Good, the Unconditioned, or, if you like, God. This is our Source and our End, the only thing that is truly real and perfect, the very Ground of our and all Being, the only thing worth pursuing, loving and being concerned with. This Alone requires, demands, and deserves our attention, allegiance, love, esteem and devotion. This Alone should be our only concern and the only thing we have in view, are concerned with and consider important and worth striving for and exerting ourselves about. To raise any teacher or person, living or dead, to the status of guru and, effectively or overtly, spiritual intercessor is to give to a sensory phenomenon in space-time the consideration, attention, devotion, etc. that is due only to the One. It is a crime against Reality and the nature of things, a dangerous distraction and diversion from the Path. Of course, one will be told in such systems that the guru is necessary for attaining the Absolute, but this is not true, as will be discussed further below. Though it is outside the scope of this essay, it may be mentioned in passing that the same charge of idolatry applies to religious institutions and churches in general, ordinations, credentials,
robes, costumes, rituals, ceremonies, etc. It is also another reminder that, contrary to the trend of the modern world and contemporary allegedly spiritual movements, renunciation, celibate asceticism, and whole-hearted world-denyingness are absolutely essential to and part and parcel of any real contemplative practice and higher spiritual life.

For many of the masses of people, the guru institution may serve as a convenient excuse for not actually doing the hard work of the Path oneself. They seem to think that devotion to the guru can substitute for actual spiritual practice and that the guru's alleged spiritual accomplishment will somehow rub off on them and they can become sort of parasitic on the guru's supposed condition. Of course, at any given time, very few people will ever actually tread the Path, which is so difficult, and even fewer attain, especially now when almost no one is willing to renounce the world or even understands the necessity of doing so, but there is no use in pretending that things are other than they are or looking for shortcuts. It is most important to understand what the Path actually is and entails, and if one is not doing it, to frankly acknowledge it and assess what one can and should do.

One of the important spiritual facts that the institution of gurus ignores is that it is not possible to mechanically reproduce great spiritual attainment (and, as will be discussed below, the finished person is no longer actually around to serve as a guru) generation after generation on a routine basis. (In fact, nothing in the spiritual Path can really ever be routinely produced mechanically guaranteed within a certain time frame by the simple application of spiritual technology.) True realization and the attaining of liberation is a rare and difficult thing not often met with and not always publicly announced, and it strains credulity to suppose so many lineages so readily and successfully replicating themselves over centuries. (There seems, however, to be a great overabundance of credulity at present when there are so many gurus continually arising and replicating themselves with great ease—much easier, in fact, than ever in the past even in their own traditions, when gurus are readily accepted as such even when their conduct and understanding indicates their falsity even to any even moderately informed spiritual understanding, and when certification as a spiritual teacher doesn't seem to require much more than sending in the requisite number of boxtops.)

The guru institution forms part of the authority obsession that characterizes the institutionalized religions and even their contemplative systems and traditions. The guru embodies the idea that one cannot find Truth oneself, that the Absolute is the possession of certain phenomenal, institutional, economic structures in the world complete with lineages, regalia, rituals, costumes, certifications, procedures, etc. who act as gatekeepers controlling access to the very Absolute within one's own soul as only available on their terms, that every understanding must conform to a body of lore and statements in the world, and that holiness itself is subject to approval by phenomenal institutions.

This is indicative of an even more fundamental spiritual and metaphysical error. It is absurd to maintain that realization of the transcendent Absolute is dependent upon certain institutionalized sensory phenomena in space-time, including a guru in a specific historical lineage, and that such realization can and must be certified and approved by specific sensory phenomena, i.e., the guru and tradition. (It is most important, however, to understand that realization of the Absolute does require, absolutely and without exception, full and true renunciation, asceticism, otherworldliness and complete purity of conduct and character. These are not phenomenal sensory institutes like those mentioned above, but the very fact and process of turning to the Good from the world. To realize the Good one must become like the Good. Contemplative asceticism and renunciation is the very manifestation and reflection of the Absolute in this world.)

There is yet a further fundamental metaphysical/spiritual flaw in the whole guru idea, which is based on more misunderstanding of the nature of Reality and the spiritual Path and on an erroneous realist metaphysic. When someone attains full realization of and union with the Absolute, when someone is finished, the world (including themselves) entirely ceases to exist for that person. Only the Absolute remains, and That is all that is known and experienced. No actual phenomenal interaction is possible between “a fully enlightened person” (to the extent that that phrase has actual meaning) as such and deluded souls remaining here in the lowest and least real level of Reality of individuated sensory existence in space-time. Thus, the very idea of an “enlightened” guru, Chan master, avatar, godman, Buddha, siddha, etc., etc. appearing and teaching in the world is an inherent contradiction and impossibility.

But how then are we to proceed? What about the wonderful spiritual texts that we use and rely on in our practice and that guide and awaken us? What about the other souls that we do learn from and interact with so valuably on the Path? Here it is important to remember the Platonic teaching that learning is really recollection. As we proceed on the Path and our karma lightens to a certain degree, the Absolute dimly manifests to us and certain texts and teachings appear in our experiential field according to our karma that remind us, to whatever extent, of how things really are and who we really are. For practical purposes it is necessary to consider these as having a certain supposedly historical origin, but in ultimate reality this is not the case. Each soul really has its own experiential field, but our experiential fields are modified by those of others and by that of the world soul according to our mutual karmas, and so beneficial interaction can occur and people and texts and teachings can appear as our karma requires it for advancing on the Path.

Leaving gurus and godmen to themselves and their foolish devotees, let us renounce the world entirely as best as we can and continuously earnestly strive forward for union with the Absolute and release from the cycle of birth and death with our whole hearts, minds and souls!

© 2014 Eric S. Fallick platonicascetic (at) (gee) mail (dot) com



Saturday, March 3, 2018

Meditation for Worldlings and Renunciation


Meditation for Worldlings

by Eric S. Fallick

In an earlier essay, The Practice of Contemplation, an outline was sketched of the path of the practice of contemplation/meditation leading to the ultimate goal of re-union with the Absolute and liberation from the cycle of birth and death. I hope that it was made clear therein that, contrary to popular belief, even among those who should know better, in the present day, this Path and real contemplation of ultimate soteriological value can only be practiced in reality by true celibate ascetics/renunciants (not to be confounded with membership in institutional monastic orders, ritual initiations, names and costumes, church affiliations, economic dependence on others, and other such things of this world). This should be obvious from spiritual and metaphysical principles, from the very nature of Reality and the very nature of the Path and Practice, not to mention so-called history and traditional texts and the records of the ancients, but what remains under the name of spirituality in these very dark times is thoroughly confused. Even, or, sadly, especially, those who are visible as advocates of contemplation these days take pride in abrogating the renunciant principles and teachings and examples of the past and claiming that everyone, every worldling with romantic/sexual relationships and activities, families, wealth, pursuit of worldly pleasures and occupations, engagement in entertainments, social action, etc., etc., can effectively practice meditation/contemplation and attain significant spiritual realization. (“You too can be a mystic in your spare time without changing or giving up anything! Yes, in only 20 minutes a day in the comfort of your own home while still living as an ordinary worldling enmired in becoming you can accomplish what the mystics and contemplatives of the past had to devote their whole lives to 100% renouncing the world completely in celibacy, poverty, abstinence, etc. with only a few attaining after many years of tremendous effort. Just cut out and send in the coupon below to be the first on your block...”) They even think that this is an advance of the present day and the modern world over the benighted spiritual past and proudly announce and emphasize that their contemplation systems, courses, institutes, etc. are for combining contemplative and active lives, contemplation and ordinary worldly lives, pleasures and pursuits. Even though they refer to and purport to read and study the great contemplatives and mystics of the past of their respective traditions, they seem to hear from them only what they want to hear and studiously ignore their central renunciant teachings. Even though they cite them as authorities, they seem to think they were actually fools since they benightedly advocate and practiced celibate renunciation and asceticism and total devotion, when now, as they claim, the same thing can be done in this supposedly advanced modern world by everyone (or at least those who can afford to attend a workshop or retreat or course or institute) with little effort and without renouncing or giving up or abstaining from anything.

Let it be stated clearly and unequivocally, as galling as it may be to this egalitarian age. The celibate renunciant, ascetic life and way is better than and spiritually superior to the life and way of worldings. It is absolutely and unquestionably necessary for and part and parcel of, permanently and for the whole Path from beginning to end, the real practice and attainment of genuine contemplation of ultimate soteriological value. Celibate, abstinent, vegetarian, teetotaling, otherworldly, world-denying, wholly devoted, contemplative asceticism and renunciation is the very reflection of the Absolute in this world, is of the very essence of any higher spiritual practice, and its necessity can never be abrogated for genuine ultimate spiritual and mystic experience. (Not to mention that it is infinitely more happy, satisfying and real than the worldly life!) It is the greatest tragedy of this modern brave new world that it has all but disappeared and been denied by false and confused understanding and, consequently, real experience and understanding of the Absolute has become all but inaccessible. The argument from the great spiritual texts of the 'past' won't be pursued further here. If people read the great texts of their systems with open eyes and minds and hearts, what I am saying will be obvious. If not, detailed and extensive explication of specific texts is a massive undertaking well beyond the scope of this essay. (Also, 'history' is not really real and empirical data is not an adequate basis for spiritual practice—but these are matters for another time.) To expound the matter thoroughly on the basis of spiritual and metaphysical principles would also be the matter for a whole volume, but it is perhaps worth saying a few very brief words here.

We find ourselves lost, to great pain, in individuated sensate existence in space-time apparently separated from the the Absolute, the Good, the One and wandering endlessly in the cycle of repeated birth and death. We have turned away from the Good and our original state of unity with It and pursued individuality and separated subject and objects running further and further into differentiation. If we wish to be free, to obtain liberation, re-union with the One, the ultimate soteric goal and release, we need to reverse the process and return to the Absolute. We can only go either one way or the other: either further and deeper into becoming and misery or back to the Good. We cannot go both ways at the same time. Our every volitional thought and action takes us in either one of the two directions, back to the One or further into endless becoming. Every time we pursue worldly desires and activities (beyond what is absolutely necessary for psycho-physical survival while we are still at this level), every time we pursue sensual pleasures, every time we give the senses and the body more credence than is absolutely necessary, we run further into differentiation, create more karma and misery and delusion, and bind ourselves tighter to becoming. (It is no use pretending, as people do nowadays, that one can somehow engage in these things “without attachment” and thereby avoid their consequences!) Every time we renounce the things and concerns and spirit of this world and the senses and worldly desires and pursuits and pleasures (truly, with a real supranatural motivation ultimately stemming from the true core of our being where it touches and really is the Absolute Itself, not just in form with covert worldly motives) and turn our souls to the Good, we move in the direction of returning to the Absolute and liberation. Our soul's nature is to love. We can either turn our love to the things of this world or to the Absolute, to God, if you like. We can't love both at the same time. The same force can't be directed in two opposing directions at the same time. To the extent that we love and pursue the things of this world and the senses, to that extent we don't love and turn to the Good, and vice versa. It is that simple—you have to choose one or the other—the matter cannot be finessed no matter how much confusion and sophistry latter day alleged spiritual writers, teachers, practitioners, etc. may employ!

Let us take just a few simple examples. Sexual activity is the exact opposite of contemplation/meditation. Perhaps more than anything else, it draws the soul the wrong way into the senses and becoming and the body and space-time and differentiation and bondage. Contemplation, on the other hand, is the exact opposite process of separating the soul from the body and sensate existence and turning it back to the Good. Thus, the two are completely incompatible, go in exact opposite directions, and it is more than obvious that celibacy (in the fullest sense of the word) is absolutely and indispensably necessary for the practice of genuine contemplation of ultimate soteriological value and liberation and genuine spiritual attainment. The same thing goes for romantic love in a broader sense along with its physical aspect. The same thing goes also for non-sexual love, in the worldly sense, and attachment to family, children, friends, creation, etc. To the extent that you love and are attached to anyone and anything in this world, any differentiated particular, to that extent you don't love and aren't attached to the Absolute, and can't effectively practice real contemplation. This, of course, extends down to everything including desire for the pleasures of food and drink and possessions, etc., all of which are insuperable opposites and obstacles to true contemplation. Further, engaging in entertainments such as movies, television, theater, novels, etc., not only moves in the opposite direction from real contemplation, but causes one to absorb the worldly passions and confused thoughts and desires presented therein and thereby moves one in the wrong direction even just cognitively.

Thus, it is clear and obvious that the real practice of contemplation and the pursuit of the ultimate soteric goal is a business for true celibate ascetics and renunciants only—as exactly opposite as this is to the trend of the times and however upset this fact may make people. But if an ordinary worldling is reading this who wants to pursue the spiritual life and practice, in some fashion at least, contemplation or meditation, if someone is reading this who is married or in a romantic relationship, has a family, etc., etc. etc., how are they to proceed? What can and should they do? The first thing is to accurately and honestly understand and assess and accept the situation as described above and in the various systems and cease from pretension and the delusions of grandeur promoted by present day expounders and strive for correct conceptual understanding. Next, one must be sure that one is following and observing at least the minimum spiritual standards of conduct that apply to everyone in the world: being a vegetarian, not drinking alcohol or using intoxicants, being faithful to one's monogamous romantic partner, never lying, cheating or stealing, etc. Then, one can remove however much of one's free time as one can in one's situation from the pursuit of sensual pleasures, entertainments, etc. and devote all that time to reading and study of the primary source texts of one's spiritual system (not the pabulum and falsities of modern writers, but the records of the ancients!). As to the actual period of formal sitting in meditation, rather than ineffectually pretending to practice (and, even worse, to attain!) methods aiming directly and immediately at the final goal of liberation or union, and certainly rather than practicing the presently popular practices of simply concentrating on sense data and bodily functions, of being in the “now”, that are actually anti-spiritual (by definition) and more likely to lead to rebirth as a shellfish or the like, I would like to suggest the pursuit of cognitive meditations leading to cognitive and conceptual changes, to changes in one's way of viewing the world, that are actually a form of contemplation (to change one's thinking, in a deep sense, is to change one's mode of being), such changes being a necessary prerequisite to raising the true aspiration for liberation and practice in a future birth as a renunciant and ascetic of the ultimate soteriological contemplation. At present, I would like to suggest just a few ideas of such cognitive meditations leading to a change of weltanschauung in two essential areas. The first area is in developing the attitude of renunciation, of realizing the unsatisfactoriness of the worldly and worldly life, of individuated sensate existence, and of the inconceivable wonderfulness of the Absolute, and the necessity and desirability of striving to move from one to the other. The other area is in adopting an idealist (in the philosophical sense) perspective, of realizing that all is mind, spirit or experience, that there is no physical world apart from experience of it by souls or minds, whether ours or the world's.

The exercises I would like to suggest for formal meditation practice during the formal sitting period are as follows:

1. During your meditation period, which presumably wouldn't be all that long, just continually and repeatedly reflect upon and consider the immeasurable greatness, perfection, unity, goodness, beauty, unchangingness, etc. of the Absolute, and, by contrast keep reflecting on the instability, pain, unsatisfactoriness, multiplicity, deceptiveness, imperfection, evil, etc. of the sense-world, sense-objects and the worldly desires you have always been pursuing. Keep maintaining and contrasting these two opposed reflections so that the One seems most desirable and the sense-world revolting.

2. Contemplative reading of Plato's Phaedo: Reread repeatedly the Phaedo slowly and carefully stopping to reflect on each thing that grabs you, particularly the more transcendent parts and as it provides a continuing reflection contrasting the sense-world and sense-objects and the body as highly problematic with the wisdom of the soul by itself contemplating the divine things by themselves. (To forestall any possible misunderstanding and confusion, let it be noted that the married Socrates of the dialog (along, in fact, with the entire frame story itself) is just an allegorical symbol, in Homeric fashion, unconcerned with a historical Socrates, and in no way contradicts the principles given above. Socrates represents the true or higher soul and the family that has a cameo appearance at the beginning and end represents the faculties of the lower or animal soul that the higher soul is forced to perfunctorily deal with while still in the prison of the body.)

3. Practice the meditation exercise given by Plotinus in Ch.2 of Ennead V.1 (p. 15 of Ennead V in the Loeb's translation by A. H. Armstrong published by Harvard University Press).

The first two of the above exercises are aimed at the first cognitive shift outlined above and the third exercise at the second cognitive shift. Additional practices along the same lines could be developed by each individual. Understand things as they really are and work as hard as you can under your circumstances. You have been wandering endlessly through countless births through the long dark night of time and becoming. It is high time to start waking up and start to cease being deluded by this world and the things and activities in it and by other worldlings!



©2015 Eric S. Fallick platonicascetic (at) (gee) mail (dot) com

Thursday, February 22, 2018

On Genuine Spiritual Experience



On Genuine Spiritual Experience

by Eric S. Fallick


We live in a time of the most immense and profound spiritual and philosophical confusion. Despite the self-infatuated notion of the age that it represents the pinnacle of historical “progress” (“progress” being, incidentally, a notion entirely of its own creation), the modern world is the darkest and most lacking in wisdom in at least the last 2500 years. Materialism, positivism, subjectivism, anti-intellectualism, in the more profound sense of the term, and worldliness are prevalent everywhere and in all institutions. The notions of conforming oneself to an objective divine reality or structure, and that it is the objective divine reality that is important, and otherworldliness, more available in the pre-modern world, have been almost entirely forgotten or dismissed as antiquated, and this-worldliness, concern only for this phenomenal world, and concern only with individual subjective experiences and desires as being valid and important has more or less entirely pervaded even things that are designated as “spiritual”--a natural consequence of the belief that only the things of the senses and matter are real, which has, consciously or unconsciously, been steamrolling further and further since the inception of the modern world. Yet, otherworldliness, concern with and adapting to an objective divine reality, renunciation, and ascent through divine intellect are what any real spiritual practice and spirituality are about, whether this goes with the prejudices, thoughts, and tendencies of the present day or not. Since the opposite attitude seems to be found in virtually all writings, publications, teachers, organizations, practices, etc. currently advertised as spiritual, the result is that there is very little real spiritual stuff going on anywhere, and the spiritual seeker is unlikely to ever encounter any real spiritual teaching unless he turns directly to the writings of the ancients and has the ability to understand them directly and correctly on his own without help. One greatly important area where this mess manifests itself is in the understanding, or lack thereof, of what constitutes genuine spiritual experience and the methods and nature of its attainment, despite, or because, of the present exclusive concern with subjective or phenomenal experience and gain. It is pretentious for a poor slob to try to descant on such a subject, but given the enormous confusion prevalent, perhaps it is worth daring to try to say a few words on the matter based on the teachings of Homer, Plato, and Plotinus.

The comments made thus far already give us some pointers in the direction of determining authentic spiritual experience. It doesn't come cheap—indeed, the whole world must be sacrificed for it. World-denying renunciation and otherworldliness are necessary, though not alone sufficient, conditions for any genuine spiritual experience, and such experience results always all the more in renunciation, unconcern for this world, and otherworldliness. It is not attained quickly, easily, or by many. The people of the present day must think that all the great sages and practitioners of the past, even of their own systems, were spiritually retarded, since they think that everybody and their brother now attains spiritual accomplishment and teaching credentials quickly and easily without giving up anything, no fuss, no mess, while the ancients struggled and exerted the greatest efforts for many years and lifetimes with only a few attaining in a given birth. Real spiritual experience comes only as the result of prolonged, sustained, intense, concentrated, exclusive, properly directed effort, not just in contemplation/meditation alone, but accompanied by true renunciation and asceticism, strictest moral discipline, and correct philosophical understanding and study. It certainly does not arise spontaneously from such things as immersion in the beauties of nature, uplifting music or art or literature, emotional experiences or relationships, physiological practices, just listening to and hanging out with a groovy guru, etc., etc. It can never arise accompanied by or be followed, after any amount of time, by indulgence of any worldly or sensual desires, moral misconduct of any kind, use of intoxicants, flesh-eating, political, social, organizational, or self-aggrandizing activities, etc. True spiritual experience is supra-rational, not infra-rational. It is not at all attained by abandoning rational thinking and immersing oneself in pre-critical sense feeling, but by shifting 'thought' into the transcedental realm of the Divine Mind-Thought and the Platonic Forms/Ideas, which is intermediate between this sense-world of birth, decay, and death and the One itself. (Experience of this Nous is also legitimately to be considered authentic, if intermediate and limited, spiritual experience, but is not the ultimate genuine spiritual experience that is the concern of this essay. Even to reach this intermediate stage, however, is a most difficult, remarkable, substantial, and rare achievement.) One of the greatest and most pervasive of errors these days seems to be the idea that somehow spiritual and meditation practice involves abandoning thinking clearly and rationally and just focusing on and plunging oneself down to the level of exclusive attention to bodily sensations, feelings, and emotions, perhaps a reflection of the delusive modern idea that physical things and 'nature' are more real than ideal things and values, which is really just the opposite of actual spiritual practice and certainly has never commended itself to the authentic sages of the past of whatever system.

What then is the genuine spiritual experience we have been considering? It is only the direct experience of, and ultimately re-union with or in, the Absolute Itself, the One, the Good. This experience is completely, totally, and qualitatively different from any phenomenal experience, just as the Absolute Itself is totally and completely different from (though, of course, containing and 'immanent' in) any and every thing. It is completely transcendent and not another experience in or of this world at all. It is not really a “personal” experience at all. In truth, it is not really an experience of the little individual phenomenal self, but is really the Absolute re-manifesting Itself to the final and blessed elimination of the experience of the individual phenomenal self. This does not happen all at once to the complete degree, and there may be a very, very long time of continued effort and pain from an initial glimpse and authentic experience to the complete re-manifestation of the Absolute, but when the end is finally reached, all there is left is the Absolute Itself and Its own singular absolute unchanging experience, with no concern at all or, in our sense, awareness of this world. Of course, throughout the long journey of the Path through many rebirths through the long dark night of time, there will be many experiences, insights, changes, and understandings that we may, if we like, designate as in some sense “spiritual”, but they are only so, only of value, to the extent to which they move us along the Path to the one ultimate transcendent type of absolute experience that we have been designating genuine spiritual experience, which is the only portal to and, in the end, state of freedom from birth and death.

By this point any of my more hip, groovy, and modern readers (if I have any readers at all) may have already left me, and I am afraid that perhaps some readers who are still with me may feel that the Absolute and the genuine spiritual experience of it have appeared as so utterly transcendent and wonderful that they may be discouraged and despondent and impatient of their attainment, which has appeared as by no means the quick and easy matter that many nowadays imagine. But be encouraged and take heart! There is nothing else at all to any degree worth aiming at and striving for, nothing even faintly as wonderful, nothing in this world worth even the slightest in comparison, than this genuine spiritual experience and the Supreme Good Itself. Even if it takes a thousand rebirths of strenuous effort and hardship and struggle, that is as nothing compared to the Good to be attained and, indeed, there simply is no other way to go and the thought of not fully exerting oneself on and dedicating oneself fully to this Path is not even to be entertained. Press on!



©2012 Eric S. Fallick platonicascetic (at) (gee) mail (dot) com







Wednesday, February 21, 2018

The Practice of Contemplation

The Practice of Contemplation

by Eric S. Fallick

The formal practice of contemplation is the central transformative practice of the Path to liberation. This is especially so in a spiritual system based on an idealist metaphysic. (Conversely, such a metaphysic is implied by the fact that all the systems of the philosophia perennis, even non-idealist ones, consider that the practice of “meditation” or contemplation is the means of changing one's mode or state of being.) Since all is mind or spirit or thought, experience without referent; since Reality is, in fact, contemplation, and knowing or experience is not possible without the Absolute, the absolutely essential practices of moral discipline, renunciation, and asceticism, and the necessary ancillary study and reading and thought and reflection may all be taken as also being forms of contemplation. Contrary to the prevailing view and practice in these darkest of times, when “meditation practice” is “taken up” by worldlings all and sundry without philosophical understanding, without giving up anything, and with a view just towards being healthy, wealthy, and wise, genuine spiritual contemplation is a difficult practice of contemplative ascetics requiring renunciation of the world and worldly pursuits and desires, strict moral discipline, and the ability to think and discern clearly, and is based on a definite metaphysical or philosophical understanding or view of the nature of Reality, and has a definite aim or telos. In this short essay, I would like to try and present a very brief discussion of Platonist contemplation practice.

Plato and Plotinus were the greatest of mystics, contemplatives, and spiritual teachers. Although in modern times the teaching of the divine Plato has, unfortunately, been presented as just “philosophy” in the modern sense of the term as just thinking about things, it is, in fact, a spiritual and soteriological system more akin to the Indian systems and the Greek systems of Orphism and Pythagoreanism. It has, however, happily, never become an organized, institutional religion for the many, never has had an organized, ritualized monastic order, etc. This has allowed it to retain its purely transcendent, spiritual nature and great liberating power, but perhaps has led many moderns to overlook its actual nature and content. Similarly, the dialectical form and, in the case of Plato himself, often symbolic, allegorical, and anagogical form of presentation used may lead to a lack of understanding or appreciation. Platonism requires of the individual practicer, contemplative ascetic, or philosopher in the original Platonic sense of the term considerable intelligence, discernment, and self-reliance. The goal or aim of the Platonic teaching, with, of course, its own uniqueness in various respects, is, like the allied systems mentioned above, liberation from the endless miserable cycle of repeated birth and death, of individuated existence in space-time, and, like at least some of the other systems, re-union with the Absolute. This should be obvious from, for example, an unbiased and informed reading of Plato's Phaedo, perhaps the core dialog for the Platonist practitioner and the key to understanding the rest of the Platonic corpus.

As indicated above, real contemplation practice is based on, and in turn reveals, a particular metaphysic or understanding of Reality. Of course, actual contemplative experience transcends and is ultimately not a matter of discursive understanding and constructs, but rather is a direct transformation of state of being and union with higher Reality, but the expression of such contemplative accomplishment and transformation at the level of discursive thought yields definite understandings, and such understandings are, conversely, necessary for undertaking contemplative practice. Further, the attempt at conceptual understanding is in itself part of the practice at a lower level and continues along the Path in interaction with the knowledge directly “seen” in contemplation. Thus, it will be necessary to first sketch a very brief outline of the Platonist understanding of the nature of Reality.

The highest, ultimate, truest, most really being, in fact, the only thing fully being, Reality is the One or the Good, the self-existent Absolute, the Source of everything. This is really beyond predication, hyper-one, hyper-good, hyper-beautiful, existence beyond existence, pure knowledge without knower and known, absolute sentience without subject and object at all. It is not only completely without time and space, but even beyond eternity and infinity. This is really all that is. It is our origin and goal. Without it, neither we nor anything else would be even to the degree that we and they are. It is the ground of all experience, and our whole aim is to return entirely to this. The true noetic love at the base of our soul that is the propelling force on the Path is for This One only.

The One in its hyper-perfection emanates, without being in the slightest bit altered or affected or losing any of its total independence, the next “descending” order of Reality, Nous, commonly translated as Intellect, but which here will be rendered the Divine Mind-Thought. Here a degree of nescience has arisen so that there is a degree of multiplicity. This is the realm of the Platonic Forms or Ideas which are, however, not different from the Divine Mind that eternally and unchangingly contemplates them. Here subject and object have emerged and become distinct, but are not separated. Unlike the chaotic multiplicity of the sense-world, here there is only one each of the eternal Ideas. There is no change or time or space, but their divine paradigms of eternity, infinity, and the interrelation of the Forms have appeared. One must resist the temptation to imagine Nous as spatially separate from the One or emerging in time from it. It is more like a lesser degree of being or reality being discriminated within in it by nescience.

The Divine Mind-Thought, although lacking the hyper-perfection of the One, still is perfect enough to emanate another lower order of being or reality while remaining unchanged itself. This is the level of soul, both the World Soul or the Soul of the All and our individual souls. Here subject and object have split up and time and space and multiplicity and change have appeared. Soul creates, so to speak, the apparent multiple-object space-time world by projecting the Forms of the Divine Mind-Thought into multiple partial reflections trying to thus approximate the totality that has now been seemingly lost at this the last and lowest level of being. Soul, however, unlike the two higher levels, is unable to remain unchanged in the process and is continually caught up in and is part of its own projection. The experiential field of the World Soul contains all time and space simultaneously, encompasses the whole All, including all at once all the modifications reflected in it of the modifications of each of the experiential fields of the individual souls brought about through their respective volitional activities, and, in turn, the individual souls' experiential fields are modified reflecting all these modifications induced by their own actions with respect to the actions of others, but the individual souls do not experience these changes all at once like the World Soul, but as a continuing series in space-time that constitutes what appears to them as an involuntarily given empirical world. Again, this level is not to be thought of as actually spatially and temporally separated from the higher levels (indeed, space and time have only just emerged at this lowest and least important level), but, again, more like an even lesser degree of being or reality further discriminated within the two higher levels by a greatly increased degree of nescience.

For the World Soul and its All, there is not necessarily any fault or problem connected with its existence at this level. It is merely the necessary and, in some sense, permanent radiation of the Divine Mind-Thought. For the individual souls, however, which are in some sense microcosms of the whole system capable of in some sense existing at all three levels, being here as individuals in space-time and as subjects with separate objects is the greatest of faults and errors. They have, through nescience, dared to move away existentially from the higher unities, to want to belong to themselves and objects as separate individuals, and have forgotten their true identity as really being the One. Thus, they wander further and further away, deeper and deeper into nescience, forgetting the Real more and more, continually projecting the Forms they have forgotten as such into new supposed objects which they exalt as more important than and to themselves, and thus experience endless misery (in fact, just the fact of being here at this lowest level at all is the most hellish suffering compared to the hyper-bliss of being the One) reincarnating in an endless series of forms both human and non-human.

This then is the situation and reality in which we presently find ourselves, and the obvious task is to reverse the whole process, escape totally from space and time and multiplicity and individuality, and even from eternity and infinity and totality, and return to just being the One. This is the Path of Contemplation. In understanding this process and path, it is important to note that the nature of the individual soul is to love, and it is where and is what it loves. While the soul's true love is only for its source, the One, to which it really longs to return, in its present fallen condition this has been forgotten and its love has been altogether turned around and misdirected through nescience to the things of this world and itself, pursuing which, its misdirected love becomes all the more misdirected and it ties its bonds tighter and tighter in a vicious cycle of ever-increasing nescience. Of the essence of the Path, then, and continuing throughout it, is the continuous effort to give up all love for all the things of this world and the individual self and to redirect all the soul's love back exclusively towards the Good, the Absolute. True renunciation and true knowledge go hand in hand together. (This, incidentally, is why the Socrates of the Symposium, who represents the higher divine part of the soul, states that he says that he knows nothing other than the things of love (177d 7-8).) It is also important to note that the soul, as stated above a sort of microcosm of the whole system of reality, never really entirely descends, but part of it, however much it may be forgotten by the lower part we are mostly exclusively aware of, remains always above in the higher realities, and it is through this higher part that we need to pull ourselves back up. Also, it needs to be remembered that everything is really spirit, mind, or contemplation, and that discursive thinking and “physical” action are really lower weaker forms of contemplation even though they appear to us in our delusion to be dealing with and attempting to manipulate an objective, external, and physical or mental, in the lowest, psychological sense of the word, object-world. Actions and thoughts directed towards things in this world really aim at creating a state where different things will appear to us, which is really an altered state of contemplation.

The practice of contemplation, then, may be roughly outlined in three stages corresponding to the three levels of reality or modes of being. It should be noted, however, that actual practice is iterative and nonlinear and the three levels constantly interact with and reinforce each other throughout the Path. Also, this brief outline essay will not discuss all of the practical details and the many difficulties, troubles, hindrances, pains, and pitfalls that occur through the course of spiritual, contemplative practice. It may be noted, however, that tremendous perseverance, effort, patience, endurance, and discernment are required.

The first stage involves alteration of discursive thinking and phenomenal behavior. The practitioner must first gain a good understanding of the principles of the Path and the nature of Reality, as outlined above, and of the unsatisfactory nature of worldly life and repeated rebirth. He must stop thinking like a worldling and start thinking as a renunciant, always thinking of how things are and of getting free, always seeing things in terms of universal principles, not particular occurrences, as much as possible not thinking of worldly matters and desires beyond what is necessary, trying to gain greater understanding, in thought and emotion turning his concern and love away from all the things of this world and towards the Divine Mind-Thought and the Absolute, etc. This is done through reading, study, and reflection with continuous effort. (Ideally, it is, of course, good also to have the association of, teaching of, and discussion with other, more advanced, or at least equal, renunicants and contemplatives, but, unfortunately, in this dark age, such are hardly to be found, so the sincere aspirant is basically left on his own with the writings of the ancients as his only guides.) The practitioner must also in deed renounce all worldly activities, pursuits, and desires as much as possible, and devote all his time and energy, beyond what is necessary for psycho-physical survival, to contemplation and study. This includes celibacy, vegetarianism, teetotaling, abstention from entertainments and social events, complete honesty, kindness and non-harming, etc.-- the cultivation of all moral and ascetic virtue. All this may seem like only necessary preparatory requirements for contemplation, but since, as stated above, all is really contemplation, and to know is to be, these practices of thinking and conduct are, in fact, a sort of low-level contemplation, and by changing one's thinking and actions and way of life and attitude, one has already to a certain preliminary degree brought about a change in one's contemplative state and mode of being.

The next two stages comprise what may appear as more the contemplation practice proper. The second stage is the ascent to and contemplation of and ultimately union with the Divine Mind-Thought. This stage itself consists of two parts. The first part is the ascent to the noetic realm from the things here, and the second part, the “dialectic” proper, is the sustained contemplation of and absorption into or transfer to this realm after the initial access to it has been gained. The first part is basically the one part of the Path where the question of a number of methods of proceeding arises. The dialogs give a number of different methods for making the initial ascent to the noetic realm through either the variety of different Forms or through working to gain the vision of one particular Form. The Phaedo gives the direct method of at once shifting the soul from all preoccupation with individual sense data in the space-time realm to the Ideas which they reflect while sitting in formal contemplation and as each occasion for discrimination arises in the seeming space-time flow; the Symposium gives the method of access through contemplation of the specific Form of beauty; the Republic presents the method of ascent through contemplation of the mathematical-type Forms, and etc. The basic principle and procedure underlying all these methods is, however, the same. Starting with multiple reflections of either one specific Form or of a group of related Forms or of many Forms as the occasion for each arises, one must continually abstract the universal element in each more and more, ignoring the multiple things per se and concentrating just on that universal non-sense-perceptible element, until the direct apprehension of the Idea in itself dawns upon one. When, after long, hard practice and impelled by growing love for the divine beauties one is now beginning to glimpse and by corresponding growing disgust for the sense world, one has attained at least a degree of direct apprehension of at least some of the Ideas and can fairly regularly and consistently direct one's attention to them and bring them into view, one can then proceed to the second part, the actual contemplation proper of the Divine Mind-Thought.

This second part of the second stage is, as stated, where the practicer directly and deeply contemplates and is in contact with the Divine Mind-Thought. This is the famed “dialectic”, which, contrary to popular belief, has nothing to do with discussion between people or discursive or professorial thinking. In the “dialectic”, the “dialog” is between the noetic part of the soul and the Divine Mind-Thought. Entering into the noetic realm, apprehending the Forms and their relations by directly receiving them from the Divine Mind-Thought, exploring all the structure and wonders There and being drawn in by their ravishing beauty, identifying with the Divine Mind-Thought more and more and attenuating oneself more and more, the summit of this stage is reached when the awareness and experience of the soul has entirely entrusted itself to and passed over into the awareness and experience of the Divine Mind-Thought in itself timelessly yet actively resting in itself. Within this awareness, it receives truer knowledge about itself and knows that this is not the end, but that it must and its love is impelling it to press further to the One itself. Incidentally, it may be noted that when this stage is accomplished to some degree, the practicer now has a degree of direct access to knowledge and the Forms themselves and can directly “see” the Ideas of “contemplative-asceticism-in-itself”, “spiritual-teaching-in-itself”, “righteousness-in-itself”, etc., and, to the extent that he can see them clearly and follow them despite his remaining bondage, habit-patterns, ignorance, etc., now has direct guidance from the Forms in the Divine Mind-Thought independently of any instruction appearing in the least real sense world.

Established to some degree here, one may pass on to the third and final stage of directly apprehending, approaching, and re-uniting with the Good or the One. There is not so much that can really be said of method for this stage. Understanding now in some way where the One must lie and with great longing gazing steadily in that direction, being carried out by the surge of the effulgence and love of the Divine Mind-Thought, suddenly, after a long time, the One appears and manifesting itself gives a glimpse to the contemplator. Now knowing to at least a small degree where and what It is, one keeps looking with tremendous long and protracted effort. The One keeps revealing Itself more and more, deeper and deeper, clearer and clearer, with quantum increases followed by painful returns of darkness. When the One is manifesting, the soul feels now an almost unbearable love wanting only to totally be absorbed and obliterate itself in It. Over a long time, the Vision becomes clearer and steadier, the more one can give up attachment to everything else, and the soul begins to realize its own nothingness in this contemplation—that really the One Itself is the Source of its own awareness and experience and that really contemplation of the One can only ultimately be the One contemplating, in a sense, Itself. The soul's great love is an incomplete reflection of the autonomous Unity of the One in its hyper-goodness. Continuing more and more, the One manifests Itself more and more, more and more fully, and the soul passes over more and more into the One and is more and more attenuated as itself. When the One is fully and completely manifested, then That is all there is: no more soul, no more world, no more time and space, no more even eternity and infinity and the Divine Mind-Thought; endless hyper-sentience beyond sentience, hyper-oneness beyond oneness, hyper-goodness beyond goodness, hyper-perfection beyond perfection. When This is all there is, this One only and fully, and everything else whatsoever has totally ended completely forever, this is release from birth and death and the End of the journey.

©2011 by Eric S. Fallick platonicascetic (at) (gee)mail (dot) com